linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:33:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9813c10-776f-46fc-15d4-bbd675edc402@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181126165430.4519-1-keith.busch@intel.com>

On 11/26/18 9:54 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> The iterative update to the previous version taking into account review
> comments.
> 
> Background:
> 
> The main objective is to remove the generic block layer's lock prefix
> currently required to transition a request to its completed state by
> shifting that expense to lower level drivers that actually need it,
> and removing the software layering violation that was required to use
> that mechnaism.

Thanks Keith, added for 4.21.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-26 16:54 [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates Keith Busch
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] blk-mq: Return true if request was completed Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] scsi: Do not rely on blk-mq for double completions Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 16:54 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] blk-mq: Simplify request completion state Keith Busch
2018-11-26 17:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-26 17:33 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-11-28  2:20   ` [PATCHv4 0/3] scsi timeout handling updates Ming Lei
2018-11-28  7:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 10:07       ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 10:08         ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-28 15:49           ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 15:58             ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 16:26               ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 16:31                 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-28 17:56                 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-29  1:18                   ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28 22:31                 ` Keith Busch
2018-11-28 23:36                   ` Keith Busch
2018-11-29 17:11                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-29 17:20                       ` Keith Busch
2018-12-28 12:47                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-11-29  2:15           ` Ming Lei
2018-11-29  2:39             ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-11-29  8:12               ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9813c10-776f-46fc-15d4-bbd675edc402@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).