From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:55:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfaf540a-feea-8fa6-e12e-d15731b75b61@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210408064458.vx4t3tpfnrvrd52a@shindev.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com>
On 4/7/21 11:45 PM, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> I applied this v6 series on top of the kernel v5.12-rc6 and tested again.
> I needed to apply another dependent fix patch [1] also to avoid conflict.
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=161545067909064&w=2
>
> I confirmed this series fixes the use-after-free issue, and observed no
> regression in my test set. For the series, especially for the patches #3-5,
>
> Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Hi Shin'ichiro,
Thanks again for the testing. You may want to know that this series has
been prepared and tested on top of Jens' for-next branch
(https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-next).
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 21:49 [PATCH v6 0/5] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-04-06 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] blk-mq: Move the elevator_exit() definition Bart Van Assche
2021-04-07 15:36 ` John Garry
2021-04-20 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-13 7:44 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-04-06 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] blk-mq: Introduce atomic variants of blk_mq_(all_tag|tagset_busy)_iter Bart Van Assche
2021-04-07 16:57 ` John Garry
2021-04-07 18:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-08 12:48 ` John Garry
2021-04-08 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-08 16:35 ` John Garry
2021-04-13 7:50 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-04-20 21:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-21 7:25 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-04-06 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] blk-mq: Fix races between iterating over requests and freeing requests Bart Van Assche
2021-04-07 0:02 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2021-04-07 21:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-20 21:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-06 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] blk-mq: Make it safe to use RCU to iterate over blk_mq_tag_set.tag_list Bart Van Assche
2021-04-06 21:49 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] blk-mq: Fix races between blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() and iterating over tags Bart Van Assche
2021-04-07 0:04 ` Khazhy Kumykov
2021-04-08 6:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] blk-mq: Fix a race between iterating over requests and freeing requests Shinichiro Kawasaki
2021-04-20 21:55 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfaf540a-feea-8fa6-e12e-d15731b75b61@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).