From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, hare@suse.de, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter when freeing rqs
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:22:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0d127a9-9320-6e1c-4e8d-412aa9ea9ca6@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22efcd3-274a-15c5-9e4a-248037789c4d@huawei.com>
On 1/4/21 7:33 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 23/12/2020 15:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> I propose to change the order in which blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q) and
>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(q) are called. Today blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q)
>> is called by blk_cleanup_queue() before blk_put_queue() is called.
>> blk_put_queue() calls blk_release_queue() if the last reference is dropped.
>> blk_release_queue() calls blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(). I prefer removing the
>> debugfs attributes earlier over modifying the tag iteration functions
>> because I think removing the debugfs attributes earlier is less risky.
>
> But don't we already have this following path to remove the per-hctx debugfs
> dir earlier than blk_mq_sched_free_requests() or blk_release_queue():
>
> blk_cleanup_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_hw_queues() ->
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx() ->
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx(hctx->debugfs_dir)
>
> Having said that, I am not sure how this is related directly to the problem
> I mentioned. In that problem, above, we trigger the
> blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() from the SCSI host sysfs file, and the
> use-after-free comes about from disabling the elevator (and freeing the
> sched requests) in parallel.
Hi John,
Right, what I proposed is unrelated to the use-after-free triggered by
disabling I/O scheduling.
Regarding the races triggered by disabling I/O scheduling: can these be
fixed by quiescing all request queues associated with a tag set before
changing the I/O scheduler instead of only the request queue for which the
I/O scheduler is changed? I think we already do this before updating the
number of hardware queues.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 11:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests when freeing rqs John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter " John Garry
2020-12-18 1:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-18 9:30 ` John Garry
2020-12-18 3:31 ` Ming Lei
2020-12-18 10:01 ` John Garry
2020-12-18 22:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 12:06 ` John Garry
2020-12-21 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 18:47 ` John Garry
2020-12-22 2:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-22 11:15 ` John Garry
2020-12-22 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-23 11:10 ` John Garry
2020-12-23 11:40 ` John Garry
2020-12-23 15:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-04 15:33 ` John Garry
2021-01-04 17:22 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-01-04 18:43 ` John Garry
[not found] ` <760304b3-dcbc-5b9d-0c70-627b7ff5b4eb@huawei.com>
2021-02-10 14:39 ` John Garry
2020-12-22 11:22 ` John Garry
2020-12-22 13:24 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0d127a9-9320-6e1c-4e8d-412aa9ea9ca6@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).