linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, axboe@kernel.dk, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@lst.de, hare@suse.de, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter when freeing rqs
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:22:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0d127a9-9320-6e1c-4e8d-412aa9ea9ca6@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22efcd3-274a-15c5-9e4a-248037789c4d@huawei.com>

On 1/4/21 7:33 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 23/12/2020 15:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> I propose to change the order in which blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q) and
>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(q) are called. Today blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q)
>> is called by blk_cleanup_queue() before blk_put_queue() is called.
>> blk_put_queue() calls blk_release_queue() if the last reference is dropped.
>> blk_release_queue() calls blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(). I prefer removing the
>> debugfs attributes earlier over modifying the tag iteration functions
>> because I think removing the debugfs attributes earlier is less risky.
> 
> But don't we already have this following path to remove the per-hctx debugfs
> dir earlier than blk_mq_sched_free_requests() or blk_release_queue():
> 
> blk_cleanup_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_hw_queues() ->
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx() ->
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx(hctx->debugfs_dir)
> 
> Having said that, I am not sure how this is related directly to the problem
> I mentioned. In that problem, above, we trigger the
> blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() from the SCSI host sysfs file, and the
> use-after-free comes about from disabling the elevator (and freeing the
> sched requests) in parallel.

Hi John,

Right, what I proposed is unrelated to the use-after-free triggered by
disabling I/O scheduling.

Regarding the races triggered by disabling I/O scheduling: can these be
fixed by quiescing all request queues associated with a tag set before
changing the I/O scheduler instead of only the request queue for which the
I/O scheduler is changed? I think we already do this before updating the
number of hardware queues.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-04 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 11:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests when freeing rqs John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter " John Garry
2020-12-18  1:55   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-18  9:30     ` John Garry
2020-12-18  3:31   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-18 10:01     ` John Garry
2020-12-18 22:43   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 12:06     ` John Garry
2020-12-21 18:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 18:47         ` John Garry
2020-12-22  2:13           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-22 11:15             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 16:16               ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-23 11:10                 ` John Garry
2020-12-23 11:40                   ` John Garry
2020-12-23 15:47                     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-04 15:33                       ` John Garry
2021-01-04 17:22                         ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-01-04 18:43                           ` John Garry
     [not found]                           ` <760304b3-dcbc-5b9d-0c70-627b7ff5b4eb@huawei.com>
2021-02-10 14:39                             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 11:22             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 13:24               ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0d127a9-9320-6e1c-4e8d-412aa9ea9ca6@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).