linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	<ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<hch@lst.de>, <hare@suse.de>, <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter when freeing rqs
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:33:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d22efcd3-274a-15c5-9e4a-248037789c4d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0ab85ab8-c5c7-01aa-6b39-da731b3db829@acm.org>

On 23/12/2020 15:47, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/23/20 3:40 AM, John Garry wrote:
>> Sorry, I got the 2x iter functions mixed up.
>>
>> So if we use mutex to solve blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() problem, then we
>> still have this issue in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() which I report previously
>> [0]:
>>
>> [  319.771745] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bt_tags_iter+0xe0/0x128
>> [  319.777832] Read of size 4 at addr ffff0010b6bd27cc by task more/1866
>> [  319.784262]
>> [  319.785753] CPU: 61 PID: 1866 Comm: more Tainted: G        W
>> 5.10.0-rc4-18118-gaa7b9c30d8ff #1070
>> [  319.795312] Hardware name: Huawei Taishan 2280 /D05, BIOS Hisilicon
>> D05 IT21 Nemo 2.0 RC0 04/18/2018
>> [  319.804437] Call trace:
>> [  319.806892]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2d0
>> [  319.810552]  show_stack+0x18/0x68
>> [  319.813865]  dump_stack+0x100/0x16c
>> [  319.817348]  print_address_description.constprop.12+0x6c/0x4e8
>> [  319.823176]  kasan_report+0x130/0x200
>> [  319.826831]  __asan_load4+0x9c/0xd8
>> [  319.830315]  bt_tags_iter+0xe0/0x128
>> [  319.833884]  __blk_mq_all_tag_iter+0x320/0x3a8
>> [  319.838320]  blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter+0x8c/0xd8
>> [  319.842760]  scsi_host_busy+0x88/0xb8
>> [  319.846418]  show_host_busy+0x1c/0x48
>> [  319.850079]  dev_attr_show+0x44/0x90
>> [  319.853655]  sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x128/0x1c8
>> [  319.857744]  kernfs_seq_show+0xa0/0xb8
>> [  319.861489]  seq_read_iter+0x1ec/0x6a0
>> [  319.865230]  seq_read+0x1d0/0x250
>> [  319.868539]  kernfs_fop_read+0x70/0x330
>> [  319.872369]  vfs_read+0xe4/0x250
>> [  319.875590]  ksys_read+0xc8/0x178
>> [  319.878898]  __arm64_sys_read+0x44/0x58
>> [  319.882730]  el0_svc_common.constprop.2+0xc4/0x1e8
>> [  319.887515]  do_el0_svc+0x90/0xa0
>> [  319.890824]  el0_sync_handler+0x128/0x178
>> [  319.894825]  el0_sync+0x158/0x180
>> [  319.898131]
>> [  319.899614] The buggy address belongs to the page:
>> [  319.904403] page:000000004e9e6864 refcount:0 mapcount:0
>> mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10b6bd2
>> [  319.913876] flags: 0xbfffc0000000000()
>> [  319.917626] raw: 0bfffc0000000000 0000000000000000 fffffe0000000000
>> 0000000000000000
>> [  319.925363] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff
>> 0000000000000000
>> [  319.933096] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>> [  319.938658]
>> [  319.940141] Memory state around the buggy address:
>> [  319.944925]  ffff0010b6bd2680: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ff ff ff
>> [  319.952139]  ffff0010b6bd2700: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ff ff ff
>> [  319.959354] >ffff0010b6bd2780: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ff ff ff
>> [  319.966566] ^
>> [  319.972131]  ffff0010b6bd2800: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ff ff ff
>> [  319.979344]  ffff0010b6bd2880: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>> ff ff ff
>> [  319.986557]
>> ==================================================================
>> [  319.993770] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
>>
>> So to trigger this, I start fio on a disk, and then have one script
>> which constantly enables and disables an IO scheduler for that disk, and
>> another script which constantly reads /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/host_busy .
>>
>> And in this problem, the driver tag we iterate may point to a stale IO sched
>> request.
> 
> Hi John,

Hi Bart,

Sorry for the slow reply, but I was on vacation since before you sent 
this mail.

> 
> I propose to change the order in which blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q) and
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(q) are called. Today blk_mq_sched_free_requests(q)
> is called by blk_cleanup_queue() before blk_put_queue() is called.
> blk_put_queue() calls blk_release_queue() if the last reference is dropped.
> blk_release_queue() calls blk_mq_debugfs_unregister(). I prefer removing the
> debugfs attributes earlier over modifying the tag iteration functions
> because I think removing the debugfs attributes earlier is less risky.

But don't we already have this following path to remove the per-hctx 
debugfs dir earlier than blk_mq_sched_free_requests() or 
blk_release_queue():

blk_cleanup_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_queue() -> blk_mq_exit_hw_queues() -> 
blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx() -> 
blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_hctx(hctx->debugfs_dir)

Having said that, I am not sure how this is related directly to the 
problem I mentioned. In that problem, above, we trigger the 
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() from the SCSI host sysfs file, and the 
use-after-free comes about from disabling the elevator (and freeing the 
sched requests) in parallel.

> Although this will make it harder to debug lockups that happen while
> removing a request queue, kernel developers who are analyzing such an issue
> can undo this change in their development kernel tree.
> 

Thanks,
John


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-04 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17 11:07 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] blk-mq: Avoid use-after-free for accessing old requests John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] blk-mq: Clean up references to old requests when freeing rqs John Garry
2020-12-17 11:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] blk-mq: Lockout tagset iter " John Garry
2020-12-18  1:55   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-18  9:30     ` John Garry
2020-12-18  3:31   ` Ming Lei
2020-12-18 10:01     ` John Garry
2020-12-18 22:43   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 12:06     ` John Garry
2020-12-21 18:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-21 18:47         ` John Garry
2020-12-22  2:13           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-22 11:15             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 16:16               ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-23 11:10                 ` John Garry
2020-12-23 11:40                   ` John Garry
2020-12-23 15:47                     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-04 15:33                       ` John Garry [this message]
2021-01-04 17:22                         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-01-04 18:43                           ` John Garry
     [not found]                           ` <760304b3-dcbc-5b9d-0c70-627b7ff5b4eb@huawei.com>
2021-02-10 14:39                             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 11:22             ` John Garry
2020-12-22 13:24               ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d22efcd3-274a-15c5-9e4a-248037789c4d@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).