* kmemleak complaints on request queue stats (virtio)
@ 2017-03-29 17:02 Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-29 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-03-29 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-block
Hi,
I just got the below kmemleak report. Just thought I'd send it
out as I don't have time to look into it just now...
--
unreferenced object 0xffff8ab236717920 (size 32):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892551 (age 9966.044s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
20 79 71 36 b2 8a ff ff 20 79 71 36 b2 8a ff ff yq6.... yq6....
00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff e0 c1 4b 9b ff ff ff ff ..........K.....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff9b84212a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
[<ffffffff9b1ff780>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x110/0x230
[<ffffffff9b3cd74f>] blk_alloc_queue_stats+0x1f/0x40
[<ffffffff9b3bacd4>] blk_alloc_queue_node+0x94/0x2e0
[<ffffffff9b3cbdd0>] blk_mq_init_queue+0x20/0x60
[<ffffffff9b593665>] loop_add+0xe5/0x270
[<ffffffff9bfe348b>] loop_init+0x10b/0x149
[<ffffffff9b002193>] do_one_initcall+0x53/0x1a0
[<ffffffff9bf8b133>] kernel_init_freeable+0x16d/0x1f3
[<ffffffff9b83ed0e>] kernel_init+0xe/0x100
[<ffffffff9b84d27c>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
unreferenced object 0xffff8ab23666d440 (size 32):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892552 (age 9966.040s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
40 d4 66 36 b2 8a ff ff 40 d4 66 36 b2 8a ff ff @.f6....@.f6....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2a 21 84 9b ff ff ff ff ........*!......
backtrace:
[<ffffffff9b84212a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
[<ffffffff9b1ff780>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x110/0x230
[<ffffffff9b3cd74f>] blk_alloc_queue_stats+0x1f/0x40
[<ffffffff9b3bacd4>] blk_alloc_queue_node+0x94/0x2e0
[<ffffffff9b3cbdd0>] blk_mq_init_queue+0x20/0x60
[<ffffffff9b596382>] virtblk_probe+0x172/0x700
[<ffffffff9b4e3193>] virtio_dev_probe+0x143/0x1f0
[<ffffffff9b56eb7f>] driver_probe_device+0x2bf/0x460
[<ffffffff9b56edff>] __driver_attach+0xdf/0xf0
[<ffffffff9b56c914>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa0
[<ffffffff9b56e3ce>] driver_attach+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff9b56decd>] bus_add_driver+0x1fd/0x270
[<ffffffff9b56f910>] driver_register+0x60/0xe0
[<ffffffff9b4e2e10>] register_virtio_driver+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff9bfe351a>] init+0x51/0x7e
[<ffffffff9b002193>] do_one_initcall+0x53/0x1a0
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: kmemleak complaints on request queue stats (virtio)
2017-03-29 17:02 kmemleak complaints on request queue stats (virtio) Sagi Grimberg
@ 2017-03-29 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-29 17:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2017-03-29 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sagi Grimberg, linux-block
On 03/29/2017 11:02 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got the below kmemleak report. Just thought I'd send it
> out as I don't have time to look into it just now...
>
> --
> unreferenced object 0xffff8ab236717920 (size 32):
> comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892551 (age 9966.044s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 20 79 71 36 b2 8a ff ff 20 79 71 36 b2 8a ff ff yq6.... yq6....
> 00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff e0 c1 4b 9b ff ff ff ff ..........K.....
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff9b84212a>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4a/0xa0
> [<ffffffff9b1ff780>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x110/0x230
> [<ffffffff9b3cd74f>] blk_alloc_queue_stats+0x1f/0x40
> [<ffffffff9b3bacd4>] blk_alloc_queue_node+0x94/0x2e0
> [<ffffffff9b3cbdd0>] blk_mq_init_queue+0x20/0x60
> [<ffffffff9b593665>] loop_add+0xe5/0x270
> [<ffffffff9bfe348b>] loop_init+0x10b/0x149
> [<ffffffff9b002193>] do_one_initcall+0x53/0x1a0
> [<ffffffff9bf8b133>] kernel_init_freeable+0x16d/0x1f3
> [<ffffffff9b83ed0e>] kernel_init+0xe/0x100
> [<ffffffff9b84d27c>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
You don't mention what you are running? But I'm assuming it was my 4.12
branch. If so, this is fixed in a later revision of it. If you pull an
update, it should go away.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: kmemleak complaints on request queue stats (virtio)
2017-03-29 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2017-03-29 17:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2017-03-29 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, linux-block
> You don't mention what you are running? But I'm assuming it was my 4.12
> branch.
Ehh, details...
> If so, this is fixed in a later revision of it. If you pull an
> update, it should go away.
Will try, thanks Jens.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-29 17:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-29 17:02 kmemleak complaints on request queue stats (virtio) Sagi Grimberg
2017-03-29 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-29 17:06 ` Sagi Grimberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).