* [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
@ 2021-06-09 6:30 Ming Lei
2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2021-06-09 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-block, Ming Lei, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea, John Garry
tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
use-after-free.
Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
Reported-by: syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
{
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int flags = 0;
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
@@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
hctx->sched_data = NULL;
}
+ flags = hctx->flags;
}
blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
- if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
+ if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
q->elevator = NULL;
}
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-09 6:30 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched Ming Lei
@ 2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
2021-06-09 10:16 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-14 22:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-18 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2021-06-09 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea
On 09/06/2021 07:30, Ming Lei wrote:
Thanks for the fix
> tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
> freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
> ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
> check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
> use-after-free.
>
> Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
>
The tagset is a member of the Scsi_Host structure. So it is true that
this memory may be freed before the request_queue is exited?
> Reported-by: syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> {
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int flags = 0;
>
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
> @@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
> hctx->sched_data = NULL;
> }
> + flags = hctx->flags;
I know the choice is limited, but it is unfortunate that we must set
flags in a loop
> }
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
> if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
> e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
> blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
> - if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
> + if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
this is
blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(struct request_queue *queue)
{
sbitmap_queue_free(&queue->sched_bitmap_tags);
..
}
And isn't it safe to call sbitmap_queue_free() when
sbitmap_queue_init_node() has not been called?
I'm just wondering if we can always call
blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap()? I know it's not an ideal choice either.
Thanks,
John
> q->elevator = NULL;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
@ 2021-06-09 10:16 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-09 11:42 ` John Garry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2021-06-09 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Garry
Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:59:43AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 09/06/2021 07:30, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> Thanks for the fix
>
> > tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
> > freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
> > ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
> > check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
> > use-after-free.
> >
> > Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
> >
>
> The tagset is a member of the Scsi_Host structure. So it is true that this
> memory may be freed before the request_queue is exited?
Yeah, please see commit c3e2219216c9 ("block: free sched's request pool in
blk_cleanup_queue")
>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
> > Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> > {
> > struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> > unsigned int i;
> > + unsigned int flags = 0;
> > queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> > blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
> > @@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> > e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
> > hctx->sched_data = NULL;
> > }
> > + flags = hctx->flags;
>
> I know the choice is limited, but it is unfortunate that we must set flags
> in a loop
Does it matter?
>
> > }
> > blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
> > if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
> > e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
> > blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
> > - if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
> > + if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
> > blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>
> this is
>
> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(struct request_queue *queue)
> {
> sbitmap_queue_free(&queue->sched_bitmap_tags);
> ..
> }
>
> And isn't it safe to call sbitmap_queue_free() when
> sbitmap_queue_init_node() has not been called?
>
> I'm just wondering if we can always call blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap()?
> I know it's not an ideal choice either.
So far it may work, not sure if it can in future, I suggest to follow
the traditional alloc & free pattern.
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-09 10:16 ` Ming Lei
@ 2021-06-09 11:42 ` John Garry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2021-06-09 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei
Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea
On 09/06/2021 11:16, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:59:43AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> On 09/06/2021 07:30, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the fix
>>
>>> tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
>>> freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
>>> ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
>>> check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
>>> use-after-free.
>>>
>>> Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
>>>
>>
>> The tagset is a member of the Scsi_Host structure. So it is true that this
>> memory may be freed before the request_queue is exited?
>
> Yeah, please see commit c3e2219216c9 ("block: free sched's request pool in
> blk_cleanup_queue")
JFYI, I could recreate with the following simple steps:
root@(none)$ mount /dev/sda1 mnt
[ 27.252887] FAT-fs (sda1): Volume was not properly unmounted. Some
data may be corrupt. Please run fsck.
_hw/unbind)$ echo HISI0162:01 > ./sys/bus/platform/drivers/hisi_sas_v2
[ 31.262274] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.270314] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.278262] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.286245] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.294164] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.302143] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.310097] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phys DID NOT change
[ 31.321599] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[9:1] is gone
[ 31.429245] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[8:1] is gone
[ 31.533461] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[7:1] is gone
[ 31.637338] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[6:1] is gone
[ 31.740840] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[5:1] is gone
[ 31.750659] sd 0:0:3:0: [sdd] Synchronizing SCSI cache
[ 31.833500] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[4:1] is gone
[ 31.937351] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[3:1] is gone
[ 31.947749] sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Synchronizing SCSI cache
[ 31.953195] sd 0:0:1:0: [sdb] Stopping disk
[ 32.690815] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[2:5] is gone
[ 32.771526] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[1:1] is gone
[ 32.790406] hisi_sas_v2_hw HISI0162:01: dev[0:2] is gone
root@(none)$
root@(none)$
root@(none)$ umount mnt
[ 37.323039]
==================================================================
[ 37.330262] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched+0x110/0x1c8
[ 37.336880] Read of size 4 at addr ffff001051e80100 by task umount/547
[ 37.343401]
[ 37.344884] CPU: 4 PID: 547 Comm: umount Not tainted
5.13.0-rc5-next-20210608 #80
[ 37.352362] Hardware name: Huawei Taishan 2280 /D05, BIOS Hisilicon
D05 IT21 Nemo 2.0 RC0 04/18/2018
[ 37.361486] Call trace:
[ 37.363924] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2d0
[ 37.367586] show_stack+0x18/0x28
[ 37.370898] dump_stack_lvl+0xfc/0x138
[ 37.374643] print_address_description.constprop.13+0x78/0x314
[ 37.380472] kasan_report+0x1e0/0x248
[ 37.384131] __asan_load4+0x9c/0xd8
[ 37.387615] blk_mq_exit_sched+0x110/0x1c8
[ 37.391706] __elevator_exit+0x34/0x58
[ 37.395451] blk_release_queue+0x108/0x1d8
[ 37.399545] kobject_put+0xa8/0x180
[ 37.403029] blk_put_queue+0x14/0x20
[ 37.406601] disk_release+0xcc/0x100
[ 37.410171] device_release+0x94/0x110
[ 37.413918] kobject_put+0xa8/0x180
[ 37.417401] put_device+0x14/0x28
[ 37.420712] put_disk+0x2c/0x40
[ 37.423848] blkdev_put_no_open+0x54/0x78
[ 37.427853] blkdev_put+0x108/0x258
[ 37.431335] kill_block_super+0x5c/0x78
[ 37.435166] deactivate_locked_super+0x6c/0xd0
[ 37.439605] deactivate_super+0x8c/0xa8
[ 37.443435] cleanup_mnt+0x110/0x1c0
[ 37.447007] __cleanup_mnt+0x14/0x20
[ 37.450578] task_work_run+0xbc/0x1a8
[ 37.454236] do_notify_resume+0x2cc/0x590
[ 37.458242] work_pending+0xc/0x3c8
[ 37.461725]
[ 37.463207] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[ 37.467990] page:(____ptrval____) refcount:0 mapcount:-128
mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1051e80
[ 37.477724] flags: 0xbfffc0000000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xffff)
[ 37.484164] raw: 0bfffc0000000000 fffffc00415a9008 ffff0017fbffebb0
0000000000000000
[ 37.491900] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 00000000ffffff7f
0000000000000000
[ 37.499635] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[ 37.505198]
[ 37.506680] Memory state around the buggy address:
[ 37.511463] ffff001051e80000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
[ 37.518677] ffff001051e80080: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
[ 37.525891] >ffff001051e80100: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
[ 37.533104]^
[ 37.536324] ffff001051e80180: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
[ 37.543538] ffff001051e80200: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
ff ff ff
[ 37.550751]
==================================================================
[ 37.557963] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
root@(none)$
root@(none)$
And this patch fixes it:
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>
>>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
>>> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>>> index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>>> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
>>> {
>>> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>>> unsigned int i;
>>> + unsigned int flags = 0;
>>> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
>>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
>>> @@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
>>> e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
>>> hctx->sched_data = NULL;
>>> }
>>> + flags = hctx->flags;
>>
>> I know the choice is limited, but it is unfortunate that we must set flags
>> in a loop
>
> Does it matter?
It's just a nit on the coding style: it's not an especially good
practice to set the same value in a loop.
But, as I said, choice is limited.
>
>>
>>> }
>>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
>>> if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
>>> e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
>>> blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
>>> - if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
>>> + if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
>>> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>>
>> this is
>>
>> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(struct request_queue *queue)
>> {
>> sbitmap_queue_free(&queue->sched_bitmap_tags);
>> ..
>> }
>>
>> And isn't it safe to call sbitmap_queue_free() when
>> sbitmap_queue_init_node() has not been called?
>>
>> I'm just wondering if we can always call blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap()?
>> I know it's not an ideal choice either.
>
> So far it may work, not sure if it can in future, I suggest to follow
> the traditional alloc & free pattern.
>
>
Fine
Thanks,
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-09 6:30 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched Ming Lei
2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
@ 2021-06-14 22:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-15 10:02 ` John Garry
2021-06-18 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2021-06-14 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea, John Garry
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:30:46PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
> freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
> ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
> check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
> use-after-free.
>
> Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> {
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> unsigned int i;
> + unsigned int flags = 0;
>
> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
> @@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
> e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
> hctx->sched_data = NULL;
> }
> + flags = hctx->flags;
> }
> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
> if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
> e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
> blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
> - if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
> + if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
> q->elevator = NULL;
> }
Hello Jens,
Any chance to merge this fix?
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-14 22:07 ` Ming Lei
@ 2021-06-15 10:02 ` John Garry
2021-06-18 6:03 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2021-06-15 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea
>> Reported-by:syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
>> Cc: John Garry<john.garry@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei<ming.lei@redhat.com>
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> index a9182d2f8ad3..80273245d11a 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
>> @@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
>> {
>> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>> unsigned int i;
>> + unsigned int flags = 0;
>>
>> queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched_hctx(hctx);
>> @@ -687,12 +688,13 @@ void blk_mq_exit_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *e)
>> e->type->ops.exit_hctx(hctx, i);
>> hctx->sched_data = NULL;
>> }
>> + flags = hctx->flags;
>> }
>> blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_sched(q);
>> if (e->type->ops.exit_sched)
>> e->type->ops.exit_sched(e);
>> blk_mq_sched_tags_teardown(q);
>> - if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set->flags))
>> + if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
I suppose we could also have this also, but not nice to snoop around
sbitmap internals:
if (q->sched_bitmap_tags.sb.map)
blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>> blk_mq_exit_sched_shared_sbitmap(q);
>> q->elevator = NULL;
>> }
Thanks,
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-15 10:02 ` John Garry
@ 2021-06-18 6:03 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2021-06-18 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Garry, Jens Axboe
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:02:29AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> > > Reported-by:syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Fixes: d97e594c5166 ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap")
> > > Cc: John Garry<john.garry@huawei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei<ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Hello Jens,
Can you merge this patch?
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched
2021-06-09 6:30 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched Ming Lei
2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
2021-06-14 22:07 ` Ming Lei
@ 2021-06-18 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2021-06-18 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei, Christoph Hellwig
Cc: linux-block, syzbot+77ba3d171a25c56756ea, John Garry
On 6/9/21 12:30 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> tagset can't be used after blk_cleanup_queue() is returned because
> freeing tagset usually follows blk_clenup_queue(). Commit d97e594c5166
> ("blk-mq: Use request queue-wide tags for tagset-wide sbitmap") adds
> check on q->tag_set->flags in blk_mq_exit_sched(), and causes
> use-after-free.
>
> Fixes it by using hctx->flags.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-18 14:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-09 6:30 [PATCH] blk-mq: fix use-after-free in blk_mq_exit_sched Ming Lei
2021-06-09 8:59 ` John Garry
2021-06-09 10:16 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-09 11:42 ` John Garry
2021-06-14 22:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-15 10:02 ` John Garry
2021-06-18 6:03 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-18 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).