linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	syzbot <syzbot+660883c56e2fa65d4497@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>, Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in bacpy
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 20:24:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190317202455.32a334d1@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+YOWaU8s90joeGB4G1oc-GxrQSDnjpuFOuE4eJd5FHK3g@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:11:49 +0100
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:

> And in this case it seems to be working as intended bisecting it to a
> release tag.

I guess what went wrong here is that it had to skip quite a few
commits, and the result isn't relevant anymore. Maybe you could improve
this by handling a:

	all runs: boot failed: can't ssh into the instance

case as bad revision? And, also, if scp times out (as it did on
912964eacb11), keep retrying instead of marking the revision as good?

-- 
Stefano

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-17 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-07 13:31 KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in bacpy syzbot
2019-03-17 10:43 ` syzbot
2019-03-17 16:35   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-17 17:11     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-17 19:24       ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2019-03-18 13:00         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-03-17 20:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-03-19 13:27         ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190317202455.32a334d1@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+660883c56e2fa65d4497@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).