Re: [PATCH v2] bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix qca6390 enable failure after warm reboot

From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Zijun Hu <zijuhu@codeaurora.org>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bgodavar@codeaurora.org,
	c-hbandi@codeaurora.org, hemantg@codeaurora.org,
	rjliao@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bluetooth: hci_qca: Fix qca6390 enable failure after warm reboot
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 08:34:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526153425.GD4525@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1590461850-9908-1-git-send-email-zijuhu@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:57:30AM +0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
> Warm reboot can not restore qca6390 controller baudrate
> to default due to lack of controllable BT_EN pin or power
> supply, so fails to download firmware after warm reboot.
> 
> Fixed by sending EDL_SOC_RESET VSC to reset controller
> within added device shutdown implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <zijuhu@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> index e4a6823..b479e51 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
> @@ -1975,6 +1975,32 @@ static void qca_serdev_remove(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>  	hci_uart_unregister_device(&qcadev->serdev_hu);
>  }
>  
> +static void qca_serdev_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	int res;

nit: 'ret' would be a more standard name

> +	int timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(CMD_TRANS_TIMEOUT_MS);
> +	struct serdev_device *serdev = to_serdev_device(dev);
> +	struct qca_serdev *qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> +	const u8 ibs_wake_cmd[] = { 0xFD };
> +	const u8 edl_reset_soc_cmd[] = { 0x01, 0x00, 0xFC, 0x01, 0x05 };
> +
> +	if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_QCA6390) {
> +		serdev_device_write_flush(serdev);
> +		res = serdev_device_write_buf(serdev,
> +				ibs_wake_cmd, sizeof(ibs_wake_cmd));
> +		BT_DBG("%s: send ibs_wake_cmd res = %d", __func__, res);

Why use BT_DBG regardless of the result, instead of using BT_ERR/WARN only
in the failure case? And does it actually make sense to continue in case of
an error?

> +		serdev_device_wait_until_sent(serdev, timeout);
> +		usleep_range(8000, 10000);
> +
> +		serdev_device_write_flush(serdev);
> +		res = serdev_device_write_buf(serdev,
> +				edl_reset_soc_cmd, sizeof(edl_reset_soc_cmd));
> +		BT_DBG("%s: send edl_reset_soc_cmd res = %d", __func__, res);

ditto

> +		serdev_device_wait_until_sent(serdev, timeout);
> +		usleep_range(8000, 10000);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int __maybe_unused qca_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct hci_dev *hdev = container_of(dev, struct hci_dev, dev);
> @@ -2100,6 +2126,7 @@ static struct serdev_device_driver qca_serdev_driver = {
>  		.name = "hci_uart_qca",
>  		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(qca_bluetooth_of_match),
>  		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(qca_bluetooth_acpi_match),
> +		.shutdown = qca_serdev_shutdown,
>  		.pm = &qca_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  };
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> 