* Should I be concerned about the listed mountpoints in lsblk?
@ 2020-01-13 22:24 Michael Ruiz
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Ruiz @ 2020-01-13 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 886 bytes --]
For sda3 and sdb1, it shows that the mountpoint is the log subvolume and the
kodi subvolume, respectively. Is this just an error on lsblk part or did I
mount my system wrong? My fstab appears to have all the correct locations
listed and everything seems to be working fine. It's just this mountpoint
column shows strange locations where I would expect / and /mnt/storage (the
designated root subvolume for these devices)
$ lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 238.5G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 100M 0 part /boot/EFI
├─sda2 8:2 0 300M 0 part /boot
└─sda3 8:3 0 238.1G 0 part
└─root 254:0 0 238.1G 0 crypt /var/log
sdb 8:16 0 931.5G 0 disk
└─sdb1 8:17 0 931.5G 0 part
└─storage 254:1 0 931.5G 0 crypt /mnt/storage/kodi
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2020-01-13 22:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-13 22:24 Should I be concerned about the listed mountpoints in lsblk? Michael Ruiz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).