linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: test that send can issue clone operations within the same file
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 14:26:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191102062625.GG2543@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030122741.11073-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:27:41PM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> Verify that both full and incremental send operations can issue clone
> operations when a file has extents that are shared with itself (at
> different offsets of course).
> 
> This currently fails on btrfs but is addressed by a patch for the
> kernel titled:
> 
>   "Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/200     | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/200.out |  17 +++++++
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/200
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/200.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/200 b/tests/btrfs/200
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..e7853c4b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/200
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2019 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 200
> +#
> +# Check that send operations (full and incremental) are able to issue clone
> +# operations for extents that are shared between the same file.
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +	rm -fr $send_files_dir
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/reflink
> +. ./common/punch
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_fssum
> +_require_test
> +_require_scratch_reflink
> +_require_xfs_io_command "fiemap"
> +
> +count_extents()
> +{
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap" $1 | tail -n +2 | wc -l
> +}

There's a similar in common/rc called _count_extents(), but it opens
file with rw permission. Perhaps you could just update the existing
helper? (And add '-r' to _count_holes() and _count_attr_extents()?)

> +
> +count_exclusive_extents()
> +{
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap" $1 | tail -n +2 | cut -d ' ' -f 3 \
> +		| sort | uniq | wc -l
> +}

And maybe add this one to common helper too.

Otherwise looks good to me.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +
> +send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +rm -fr $send_files_dir
> +mkdir $send_files_dir
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Create our first test file, which has an extent that is shared only with
> +# itself and no other files. We want to verify a full send operation will
> +# clone the extent.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb1 -b 64K 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo \
> +	| _filter_xfs_io
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/foo 0 64K 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo \
> +	| _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +# Create out second test file which initially, for the first send operation,
> +# only has a single extent that is not shared.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xc7 -b 64K 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar \
> +	| _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/base 2>&1 \
> +	| _filter_scratch
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $send_files_dir/1.snap $SCRATCH_MNT/base 2>&1 \
> +	| _filter_scratch
> +
> +# Now clone the existing extent in file bar to itself at a different offset.
> +# We want to verify the incremental send operation below will issue a clone
> +# operation instead of a write operation.
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/bar 0 64K 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar \
> +	| _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/incr 2>&1 \
> +	| _filter_scratch
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/base -f $send_files_dir/2.snap \
> +	$SCRATCH_MNT/incr 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> +
> +# Compute digests of the snapshot trees so that later we can compare against
> +# digests of the trees in the new filesystem, to see if they match (no data or
> +# metadata corruption happened).
> +$FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/base.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/base
> +$FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/incr.fssum \
> +	-x $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/base $SCRATCH_MNT/incr
> +
> +# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify we get
> +# the same file contents that the original filesystem had and that files foo
> +# and bar have shared extents.
> +_scratch_unmount
> +_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/1.snap $SCRATCH_MNT
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/2.snap $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +# Compute digests of the snapshot trees in the new filesystem and compare them
> +# to the ones in the original filesystem, they must match.
> +$FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/base.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/base
> +$FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/incr.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/incr
> +
> +num_extents=$(count_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/base/foo)
> +num_exclusive_extents=$(count_exclusive_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/base/foo)
> +if [ $num_extents -ne 2 ] || [ $num_exclusive_extents -ne 1 ]; then
> +	echo "File foo does not have 2 shared extents in the base snapshot"
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap" $SCRATCH_MNT/base/foo
> +fi
> +
> +num_extents=$(count_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/foo)
> +num_exclusive_extents=$(count_exclusive_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/foo)
> +if [ $num_extents -ne 2 ] || [ $num_exclusive_extents -ne 1 ]; then
> +	echo "File foo does not have 2 shared extents in the incr snapshot"
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap" $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/foo
> +fi
> +
> +num_extents=$(count_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/bar)
> +num_exclusive_extents=$(count_exclusive_extents $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/bar)
> +if [ $num_extents -ne 2 ] || [ $num_exclusive_extents -ne 1 ]; then
> +	echo "File bar does not have 2 shared extents in the incr snapshot"
> +	$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c "fiemap" $SCRATCH_MNT/incr/bar
> +fi
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/200.out b/tests/btrfs/200.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..3eec567e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/200.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +QA output created by 200
> +wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +linked 65536/65536 bytes at offset 65536
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/base'
> +At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/base
> +linked 65536/65536 bytes at offset 65536
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> +Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/incr'
> +At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/incr
> +At subvol base
> +At snapshot incr
> +OK
> +OK
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index c7ab129e..d56dcafa 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -202,3 +202,4 @@
>  197 auto quick volume
>  198 auto quick volume
>  199 auto quick trim
> +200 auto quick send clone
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-02  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30 12:27 [PATCH] btrfs: test that send can issue clone operations within the same file fdmanana
2019-11-01 14:56 ` David Sterba
2019-11-02  6:26 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2019-11-05 14:56   ` Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191102062625.GG2543@desktop \
    --to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).