linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
@ 2020-08-13  6:33 Qu Wenruo
  2020-08-17 10:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
  2020-08-17 12:18 ` David Sterba
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2020-08-13  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

We're just doing rounding up to sectorsize to calculate the lockend.

There is no need to do the unnecessary length calculation, just direct
round_up() is enough.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 2f96f083eb8c..c71ea9e5c529 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1475,9 +1475,7 @@ lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize);
-	last_pos = start_pos
-		+ round_up(pos + write_bytes - start_pos,
-			   fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;
+	last_pos = round_up(pos + write_bytes, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;
 
 	if (start_pos < inode->vfs_inode.i_size) {
 		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
-- 
2.28.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
  2020-08-13  6:33 [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need() Qu Wenruo
@ 2020-08-17 10:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
  2020-08-17 12:18 ` David Sterba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2020-08-17 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qu Wenruo, linux-btrfs



On 13.08.20 г. 9:33 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We're just doing rounding up to sectorsize to calculate the lockend.
> 
> There is no need to do the unnecessary length calculation, just direct
> round_up() is enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/file.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 2f96f083eb8c..c71ea9e5c529 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -1475,9 +1475,7 @@ lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize);
> -	last_pos = start_pos
> -		+ round_up(pos + write_bytes - start_pos,
> -			   fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;
> +	last_pos = round_up(pos + write_bytes, fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;
>  
>  	if (start_pos < inode->vfs_inode.i_size) {
>  		struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need()
  2020-08-13  6:33 [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need() Qu Wenruo
  2020-08-17 10:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
@ 2020-08-17 12:18 ` David Sterba
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2020-08-17 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qu Wenruo; +Cc: linux-btrfs

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 02:33:52PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> We're just doing rounding up to sectorsize to calculate the lockend.
> 
> There is no need to do the unnecessary length calculation, just direct
> round_up() is enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Added to misc-next, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-17 12:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-13  6:33 [PATCH] btrfs: cleanup how we calculate lockend in lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need() Qu Wenruo
2020-08-17 10:49 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-08-17 12:18 ` David Sterba

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).