From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use more straightforward disk_bytenr to replace icsum for check_data_csum()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:54:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201109115410.605880-3-wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109115410.605880-1-wqu@suse.com>
Parameter @icsum for check_data_csum() is a little hard to understand.
It is the offset in sectors compared to io_bio->logical.
Instead of using the calculated value, let's go with disk_bytenr, as the
new name is not only straightforward, but also utilized in a lot of
existing code for file items.
To get the old @icsum value, we simply use
(disk_bytenr - (io_bio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector << 9)) >>
fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
This patch would separate file offset with disk_bytenr completely, to
reduce the confusion.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 14 ++++++++------
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index bd5a22bfee68..f8b5d3d4e5b0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -2878,7 +2878,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio = btrfs_io_bio(bio);
struct extent_io_tree *tree, *failure_tree;
struct processed_extent processed = { 0 };
- u64 offset = 0;
+ u64 disk_bytenr = (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9);
u64 start;
u64 end;
u64 len;
@@ -2924,8 +2924,9 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
mirror = io_bio->mirror_num;
if (likely(uptodate)) {
if (is_data_inode(inode))
- ret = btrfs_verify_data_csum(io_bio, offset, page,
- start, end, mirror);
+ ret = btrfs_verify_data_csum(io_bio,
+ disk_bytenr, page, start, end,
+ mirror);
else
ret = btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer(io_bio,
page, start, end, mirror);
@@ -2953,12 +2954,13 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
* If it can't handle the error it will return -EIO and
* we remain responsible for that page.
*/
- if (!btrfs_submit_read_repair(inode, bio, offset, page,
+ if (!btrfs_submit_read_repair(inode, bio, disk_bytenr,
+ page,
start - page_offset(page),
start, end, mirror,
btrfs_submit_data_bio)) {
uptodate = !bio->bi_status;
- offset += len;
+ disk_bytenr += len;
continue;
}
} else {
@@ -2983,7 +2985,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio)
if (page->index == end_index && off)
zero_user_segment(page, off, PAGE_SIZE);
}
- offset += len;
+ disk_bytenr += len;
endio_readpage_update_page_status(page, uptodate);
endio_readpage_release_extent(&processed, BTRFS_I(inode),
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index c54e0ed0b938..eff987931f0d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2843,19 +2843,27 @@ void btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered(struct page *page, u64 start,
* The length of such check is always one sector size.
*/
static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
- int icsum, struct page *page, int pgoff)
+ u64 disk_bytenr, struct page *page, int pgoff)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, fs_info->csum_shash);
char *kaddr;
u32 len = fs_info->sectorsize;
const u32 csum_size = fs_info->csum_size;
+ u64 bio_disk_bytenr = (io_bio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector << 9);
+ int offset_sectors;
u8 *csum_expected;
u8 csum[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
ASSERT(pgoff + len <= PAGE_SIZE);
- csum_expected = ((u8 *)io_bio->csum) + icsum * csum_size;
+ /* Our disk_bytenr should be inside the io_bio */
+ ASSERT(bio_disk_bytenr <= disk_bytenr &&
+ disk_bytenr < bio_disk_bytenr + io_bio->bio.bi_iter.bi_size);
+
+ offset_sectors = (disk_bytenr - bio_disk_bytenr) >>
+ fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
+ csum_expected = ((u8 *)io_bio->csum) + offset_sectors * csum_size;
kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
shash->tfm = fs_info->csum_shash;
@@ -2883,8 +2891,13 @@ static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
* when reads are done, we need to check csums to verify the data is correct
* if there's a match, we allow the bio to finish. If not, the code in
* extent_io.c will try to find good copies for us.
+ *
+ * @disk_bytenr: The on-disk bytenr of the range start
+ * @start: The file offset of the range start
+ * @end: The file offset of the range end (inclusive)
+ * @mirror: The mirror number
*/
-int btrfs_verify_data_csum(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
+int btrfs_verify_data_csum(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 disk_bytenr,
struct page *page, u64 start, u64 end, int mirror)
{
size_t offset = start - page_offset(page);
@@ -2909,8 +2922,7 @@ int btrfs_verify_data_csum(struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio, u64 phy_offset,
return 0;
}
- phy_offset >>= root->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
- return check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, phy_offset, page, offset);
+ return check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, disk_bytenr, page, offset);
}
/*
@@ -7616,7 +7628,12 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(struct inode *inode,
struct bio_vec bvec;
struct bvec_iter iter;
u64 start = io_bio->logical;
- int icsum = 0;
+ /*
+ * Dio io_bio uses file offset other than disk bytenr for
+ * io_bio->logical.
+ * Thus we need to grab disk_bytenr from bio.
+ */
+ u64 disk_bytenr = (io_bio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector << 9);
blk_status_t err = BLK_STS_OK;
__bio_for_each_segment(bvec, &io_bio->bio, iter, io_bio->iter) {
@@ -7627,8 +7644,8 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(struct inode *inode,
for (i = 0; i < nr_sectors; i++) {
ASSERT(pgoff < PAGE_SIZE);
if (uptodate &&
- (!csum || !check_data_csum(inode, io_bio, icsum,
- bvec.bv_page, pgoff))) {
+ (!csum || !check_data_csum(inode, io_bio,
+ disk_bytenr, bvec.bv_page, pgoff))) {
clean_io_failure(fs_info, failure_tree, io_tree,
start, bvec.bv_page,
btrfs_ino(BTRFS_I(inode)),
@@ -7648,7 +7665,7 @@ static blk_status_t btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(struct inode *inode,
err = status;
}
start += sectorsize;
- icsum++;
+ disk_bytenr += sectorsize;
pgoff += sectorsize;
}
}
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-09 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 11:54 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: paramater refactors for data and metadata endio call backs Qu Wenruo
2020-11-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: remove the phy_offset parameter for btrfs_validate_metadata_buffer() Qu Wenruo
2020-11-09 12:21 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-11-09 11:54 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2020-11-09 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use more straightforward disk_bytenr to replace icsum for check_data_csum() Nikolay Borisov
2020-11-09 12:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2020-11-09 11:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: paramater refactors for data and metadata endio call backs Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201109115410.605880-3-wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).