linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:06:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFDE1CE.4030100@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274461422-18433-6-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com>

On 05/22/2010 01:03 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> In order for AIO to work, we need to implement aio_write.  This patch converts
> our btrfs_file_write to btrfs_aio_write.  I've tested this with xfstests and
> nothing broke, and the AIO stuff magically started working.  Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
>   

Hi, Josef,

I've tested your patch(May 22) with my tools, and one case triggered a bug
which made writev operation hang up, more information is followed.

- Steps to trigger it:
  # mount /dev/sda8 /home/btrfsdisk -o nodatacow
  # gcc direct-io.c -o direct-io
  # ./direct-io O_DIRECT writev /home/btrfsdisk/testrw 4M

then on another tty, after "dmesg"...

[snip]
device fsid f44b0879c75c0e99-1d4b28f2d5c503ae devid 1 transid 11177
/dev/sda8
btrfs: setting nodatacow
INFO: task direct-io:1399 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
direct-io     D 0000000000000003     0  1399   1341 0x00000000
 ffff880137c379c8 0000000000000082 ffff880137c379d8 ffffffff00000000
 ffff880137c37fd8 ffff880139730000 0000000000015440 ffff880137c37fd8
 0000000000015440 0000000000015440 0000000000015440 0000000000015440
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa0119d4a>] wait_extent_bit+0xe3/0x163 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8106651f>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x39
 [<ffffffffa0119e47>] lock_extent_bits+0x7d/0xa8 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0119e88>] lock_extent+0x16/0x18 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa01025ce>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x8e/0x1be [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff810c7301>] generic_file_direct_write+0xed/0x16d
 [<ffffffffa010bb91>] btrfs_file_aio_write+0x2af/0x8d2 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81100eae>] ? try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm+0x39/0x49
 [<ffffffffa010b8e2>] ? btrfs_file_aio_write+0x0/0x8d2 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811063ed>] do_sync_readv_writev+0xc1/0x100
 [<ffffffff81106120>] ? might_fault+0x21/0x23
 [<ffffffff81106151>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
 [<ffffffff811c90ab>] ? security_file_permission+0x16/0x18
 [<ffffffff81107145>] do_readv_writev+0xa7/0x127
 [<ffffffff81107208>] vfs_writev+0x43/0x4e
 [<ffffffff811072f8>] sys_writev+0x4a/0x93
 [<ffffffff81009c32>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b


So, can you figure out if anything in your patch leads to the bug?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-27  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-21 17:03 [PATCH 1/6] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] direct-io: add a hook for the fs to provide its own submit_bio function Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests Josef Bacik
2010-05-22  1:47   ` Mike Fedyk
2010-05-22 14:02     ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: kill blockdev_direct_IO_no_locking Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write Josef Bacik
2010-05-23  8:31   ` Shi Weihua
2010-05-23 23:59     ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-27  3:06   ` liubo [this message]
2010-05-27  3:13     ` liubo
2010-05-27 12:59     ` Chris Mason
2010-05-28  1:42       ` liubo
2010-05-30  9:33   ` Dmitri Nikulin
2010-06-01 13:19     ` Chris Mason
2010-06-01 23:20       ` Dmitri Nikulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BFDE1CE.4030100@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).