linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* FS consistency while snapshoting
       [not found] <AANLkTin6V=R0UZWfymTKGwwKBwb+tXBsHkbMEo3mcY_L@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2010-10-18  2:47 ` Fabrício dos Anjos Silva
  2010-10-18  2:50   ` Chris Samuel
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabrício dos Anjos Silva @ 2010-10-18  2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

  Hi,

  I want to use AWS EC2 EBS snapshot capability and while doing this,
I want to make sure that Btrfs is consistent.

  I already know how to proceed when using XFS in the two scenarios tha=
t follow:

1) XFS on EBS
=46reeze XFS by using "xfs_freeze -f", then create EBS snapshot, then
unfreeze XFS by using "xfs_freeze -u".

2) XFS on LVM
XFS is automatically frozen/unfrozen when LVM snapshot is requested.

  What I don't know is how to proceed in the following scenarios:

3) Btrfs on EBS
What commands need to be executed to freeze/unfreeze Btrfs when
requesting EBS snapshot?

4) Btrfs on LVM
Is Btrfs automatically frozen/unfrozen when requesting LVM snapshot?

5) LVM on EBS
What command needs to be executed to freeze/unfreeze LVM? What about
the FS on top of LVM?

   I know that scenario 5 is not Btrfs related, but I appreciate if
someone could help me with that too. I also know that there is no need
to use Btrfs on LVM, but the question remains.

   If there is any difference betweens kernel 2.6.21 and 2.6.35,
please point it out.

   Thank you,

=46abr=EDcio dos Anjos Silva
LinkCom Solu=E7=F5es em T.I.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: FS consistency while snapshoting
  2010-10-18  2:47 ` FS consistency while snapshoting Fabrício dos Anjos Silva
@ 2010-10-18  2:50   ` Chris Samuel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Samuel @ 2010-10-18  2:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-btrfs

On 18/10/10 13:47, Fabr=EDcio dos Anjos Silva wrote:

> If there is any difference betweens kernel 2.6.21 and 2.6.35,
> please point it out.

btrfs wasn't merged into the mainline kernel until 2.6.29.

http://lwn.net/Articles/314325/

--=20
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-18  2:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <AANLkTin6V=R0UZWfymTKGwwKBwb+tXBsHkbMEo3mcY_L@mail.gmail.com>
2010-10-18  2:47 ` FS consistency while snapshoting Fabrício dos Anjos Silva
2010-10-18  2:50   ` Chris Samuel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).