linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Erik Jensen <erikjensen@rkjnsn.net>
Cc: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:15:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <684e89f3-666f-6ae6-5aa2-a4db350c1cd4@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj6ewO229vq6=s+T7GhUegwDADv4dzhqPiM0jo10QiKujvytA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3244 bytes --]



On 2019/6/28 下午4:00, Erik Jensen wrote:
>> So it's either the block layer reading some wrong from the disk or btrfs
>> layer doesn't do correct endian convert.
> 
> My ARM board is running in little endian mode, so it doesn't seem like
> endianness should be an issue. (It is 32-bits versus my desktop's 64,
> though.) I've also tried exporting the drives via NBD to my x86_64
> system, and that worked fine, so if the problem is under btrfs, it
> would have to be in the encryption layer, but fsck succeeding on the
> ARM board would seem to rule that out, as well.
> 
>> Would you dump the following data (X86 and ARM should output the same
>> content, thus one output is enough).
>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 17628726968320 /dev/dm-3
>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -b 17628727001088 /dev/dm-3
> 
> Attached, and also 17628705964032, since that's the block mentioned in
> my most recent mount attempt (see below).

The trees are completely fine.

So it should be something else causing the problem.

> 
>> And then, for the ARM system, please apply the following diff, and try
>> mount again.
>> The diff adds extra debug info, to exam the vital members of a tree block.
>>
>> Correct fs should output something like:
>>   BTRFS error (device dm-4): bad tree block start, want 30408704 have 0
>>   tree block gen=4 owner=5 nritems=2 level=0
>>   csum:
>> a304e483-0000-0000-0000-00000000000000000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
>>
>> The csum one is the most important one, if there aren't so many zeros,
>> it means at that timing, btrfs just got a bunch of garbage, thus we
>> could do further debug.
> 
> [  131.725573] BTRFS info (device dm-1): disk space caching is enabled
> [  131.731884] BTRFS info (device dm-1): has skinny extents
> [  133.046145] BTRFS error (device dm-1): bad tree block start, want
> 17628705964032 have 2807793151171243621
> [  133.055775] tree block gen=7888986126946982446
> owner=11331573954727661546 nritems=4191910623 level=112
> [  133.065661] csum:
> 416a456c-1e68-dbc3-185d-aaad410beaef5493ab3f-3cb9-4ba1-2214-b41cba9656fc

Completely garbage here, so I'd say the data we got isn't what we want.

> [  133.108383] BTRFS error (device dm-1): bad tree block start, want
> 17628705964032 have 2807793151171243621
> [  133.117999] tree block gen=7888986126946982446
> owner=11331573954727661546 nritems=4191910623 level=112
> [  133.127756] csum:
> 416a456c-1e68-dbc3-185d-aaad410beaef5493ab3f-3cb9-4ba1-2214-b41cba9656fc

But strangely, the 2nd try still gives us the same result, if it's
really some garbage, we should get some different result.

> [  133.136241] BTRFS error (device dm-1): failed to verify dev extents
> against chunks: -5

You can try to skip the dev extents verification by commenting out the
btrfs_verify_dev_extents() call in disk-io.c::open_ctree().

It may fail at another location though.

The more strange part is, we have the device tree root node read out
without problem.

Thanks,
Qu

> [  133.166165] BTRFS error (device dm-1): open_ctree failed
> 
> I copied some files over last time I had it mounted on my desktop,
> which may be why it's now failing at a different block.
> 
> Thanks!
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  8:34 "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  8:56 ` Patrik Lundquist
2019-05-21  9:01   ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  9:18 ` Hugo Mills
2019-05-22 16:02   ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  7:04     ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  8:10       ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]         ` <CAMj6ewO229vq6=s+T7GhUegwDADv4dzhqPiM0jo10QiKujvytA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-28  8:15           ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2021-01-18 10:50             ` Erik Jensen
     [not found]             ` <CAMj6ewMqXLtrBQgTJuz04v3MBZ0W95fU4pT0jP6kFhuP830TuA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-18 11:07               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 11:55                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-18 12:01                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 12:12                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  5:22                       ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  9:28                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-20  8:21                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-20  8:30                             ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]                               ` <CAMj6ewOqCJTGjykDijun9_LWYELA=92HrE+KjGo-ehJTutR_+w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-26  4:54                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-29  6:39                                   ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-01  2:35                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-01  5:49                                       ` Su Yue
2021-02-04  6:16                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-06  1:57                                           ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10  5:47                                             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-10 22:17                                               ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10 23:47                                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  1:24                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  4:03                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  5:24                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  5:49                                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  6:09                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  6:59                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:24                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  7:59                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:38                                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  8:52                                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:59                                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  2:47                                                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  3:16                                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  4:28                                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  6:01                                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-21  5:36                                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:25                                                               ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21 10:17 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=684e89f3-666f-6ae6-5aa2-a4db350c1cd4@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=erikjensen@rkjnsn.net \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).