linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Jensen <erikjensen@rkjnsn.net>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>, Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:49:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj6ewOze4Ngw7ydj_Ry2nLeyvWs_dB=fuGJ2zBdCEepTiC6yA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06c1665-7547-2321-3863-4c68c9818f90@gmx.com>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:24 PM Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
> Got it now.
>
> [  295.249182] read_extent_buffer_pages: eb->start=26207780683776 mirror=0
> [  295.249188] __btrfs_map_block: logical=8615594639360 chunk
> start=8614760677376 len=4294967296 type=0x81
> [  295.249189] __btrfs_map_block: stripe[0] devid=3 phy=2118735708160
>
> Note that, the initial request is to read from 26207780683776.
> But inside btrfs_map_block(), we want to read from 8615594639360.
>
> This is totally screwed up in a unexpected way.
>
> 26207780683776 = 0x17d5f9754000
> 8615594639360  = 0x07d5f9754000
>
> See the missing leading 1, which screws up the result.
>
> The problem should be the logical calculation part, which doesn't do
> proper u64 conversion which could cause the problem.
>
> Would you like to test the single line fix below?
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index b8fab44394f5..69d728f5ff9e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -6575,7 +6575,7 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info
> *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
>   {
>          struct btrfs_device *dev;
>          struct bio *first_bio = bio;
> -       u64 logical = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9;
> +       u64 logical = ((u64)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) << 9;
>          u64 length = 0;
>          u64 map_length;
>          int ret;

So… it appears my kernel tree (Arch32's 5.10.14-arch1) already has that:

blk_status_t btrfs_map_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct bio *bio,
                           int mirror_num)
{
        struct btrfs_device *dev;
        struct bio *first_bio = bio;
        u64 logical = (u64)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9;
        u64 length = 0;
        u64 map_length;
        int ret;
        int dev_nr;
        int total_devs;
        struct btrfs_bio *bbio = NULL;

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-21  8:34 "bad tree block start" when trying to mount on ARM Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  8:56 ` Patrik Lundquist
2019-05-21  9:01   ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21  9:18 ` Hugo Mills
2019-05-22 16:02   ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  7:04     ` Erik Jensen
2019-06-26  8:10       ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]         ` <CAMj6ewO229vq6=s+T7GhUegwDADv4dzhqPiM0jo10QiKujvytA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-06-28  8:15           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 10:50             ` Erik Jensen
     [not found]             ` <CAMj6ewMqXLtrBQgTJuz04v3MBZ0W95fU4pT0jP6kFhuP830TuA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-18 11:07               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 11:55                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-18 12:01                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 12:12                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  5:22                       ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-19  9:28                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-20  8:21                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-20  8:30                             ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]                               ` <CAMj6ewOqCJTGjykDijun9_LWYELA=92HrE+KjGo-ehJTutR_+w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-26  4:54                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-01-29  6:39                                   ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-01  2:35                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-01  5:49                                       ` Su Yue
2021-02-04  6:16                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-06  1:57                                           ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10  5:47                                             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-10 22:17                                               ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-10 23:47                                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  1:24                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  4:03                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  5:24                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  5:49                                                         ` Erik Jensen [this message]
2021-02-18  6:09                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  6:59                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:24                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  7:59                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:38                                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-18  8:52                                                                     ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  8:59                                                                       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  2:47                                                                         ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  3:16                                                                           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20  4:28                                                                             ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-20  6:01                                                                               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-21  5:36                                                                                 ` Erik Jensen
2021-02-18  7:25                                                               ` Erik Jensen
2019-05-21 10:17 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMj6ewOze4Ngw7ydj_Ry2nLeyvWs_dB=fuGJ2zBdCEepTiC6yA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=erikjensen@rkjnsn.net \
    --cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
    --cc=l@damenly.su \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).