* IOCTL #21 could also wait for btrfs_run_delayed_iputs
@ 2010-10-18 17:32 David Nicol
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Nicol @ 2010-10-18 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: BTRFS MAILING LIST
That's the other thing the cleaner_kthread does; conceivably some new
delayed iputs could get queued during snapshot deletions.
Thoughts?
--
"In one instance, a rai being transported by canoe was accidentally
dropped and sunk to the sea floor. Although it was never seen again,
everyone agreed that the rai must still be there, so it continued to
be transacted as genuine currency" -- Wikipedia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-10-18 17:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-18 17:32 IOCTL #21 could also wait for btrfs_run_delayed_iputs David Nicol
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).