linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/22] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:52:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1G08XNhCr9o1ANi@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48538f6e8b733d4e273510491a40a162545a7300.1666281277.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
> 
> Btrfs will need to check whether inode policies are identical for
> various purposes: if two inodes want to share an extent, they must have
> the same policy, including key identifier; symlinks must not span the
> encrypted/unencrypted border; and certain encryption policies will allow
> btrfs to store one fscrypt_context for multiple objects. Therefore, add
> a function which allows checking the encryption policies of two inodes
> to ensure they are identical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
> ---
>  fs/crypto/policy.c      | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/fscrypt.h |  7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> index 46757c3052ef..b7c4820a8001 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> @@ -415,6 +415,32 @@ static int fscrypt_get_policy(struct inode *inode, union fscrypt_policy *policy)
>  	return fscrypt_policy_from_context(policy, &ctx, ret);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * fscrypt_have_same_policy() - check whether two inodes have the same policy
> + * @inode1: the first inode
> + * @inode2: the second inode
> + *
> + * Return: %true if they are definitely equal, else %false
> + */
> +int fscrypt_have_same_policy(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2)
> +{
> +	union fscrypt_policy policy1, policy2;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2))
> +		return true;
> +	else if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(inode1) || !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode2))
> +		return false;
> +	err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode1, &policy1);
> +	if (err)
> +		return false;
> +	err = fscrypt_get_policy(inode2, &policy2);
> +	if (err)
> +		return false;
> +	return fscrypt_policies_equal(&policy1, &policy2);

You're returning bools here, you should maket his return bool instead of int.
Also you could just do

if (fscrypt_get_policy())
	return false;

Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 16:58 [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 20:52   ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:40   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:20     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:45   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:55     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 23:56       ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-21  0:37         ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:41   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:07     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] btrfs: setup qstrings from dentrys using fscrypt helper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:42   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] btrfs: store directory encryption state Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:54   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:58   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT feature flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] btrfs: permit searching for nokey names for removal Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] btrfs: use correct name hash for nokey names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] btrfs: adapt lookup for partially encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] btrfs: encrypt verity items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 23:12   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1G08XNhCr9o1ANi@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).