linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/22] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:45:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1HBkva6fzSMpm+P@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7246959ee0b8d2eeb7d6eb8cf40240374c6035c.1666281277.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> Some filesystems need to encrypt data based on extents, rather than on
> inodes, due to features incompatible with inode-based encryption. For
> instance, btrfs can have multiple inodes referencing a single block of
> data, and moves logical data blocks to different physical locations on
> disk in the background; these two features mean traditional inode-based
> file contents encryption will not work for btrfs.
> 
> This change introduces fscrypt_extent_context objects, in analogy to
> existing context objects based on inodes. For a filesystem which opts to
> use extent-based encryption, a new hook provides a new
> fscrypt_extent_context, generated in close analogy to the IVs generated
> with existing policies. During file content encryption/decryption, the
> existing fscrypt_context object provides key information, while the new
> fscrypt_extent_context provides IV information. For filename encryption,
> the existing IV generation methods are still used, since filenames are
> not stored in extents.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
> ---
>  fs/crypto/crypto.c          | 20 ++++++++--
>  fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 25 +++++++++++-
>  fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c    | 28 ++++++++++---
>  fs/crypto/policy.c          | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/fscrypt.h     | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/crypto.c b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> index 7fe5979fbea2..08b495dc5c0c 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> @@ -81,8 +81,22 @@ void fscrypt_generate_iv(union fscrypt_iv *iv, u64 lblk_num,
>  			 const struct fscrypt_info *ci)
>  {
>  	u8 flags = fscrypt_policy_flags(&ci->ci_policy);
> +	struct inode *inode = ci->ci_inode;
> +	const struct fscrypt_operations *s_cop = inode->i_sb->s_cop;
>  
> -	memset(iv, 0, ci->ci_mode->ivsize);
> +	memset(iv, 0, sizeof(*iv));
> +	if (s_cop->get_extent_context && lblk_num != U64_MAX) {
> +		size_t extent_offset;
> +		union fscrypt_extent_context ctx;
> +		int ret;
> +
> +		ret = fscrypt_get_extent_context(inode, lblk_num, &ctx,
> +						 &extent_offset, NULL);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
> +		memcpy(iv->raw, ctx.v1.iv.raw, sizeof(*iv));
> +		iv->lblk_num += cpu_to_le64(extent_offset);
> +		return;
> +	}

Please read through my review comment
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/Yx6MnaUqUTdjCmX+@quark/ again, as it
doesn't seem that you've addressed it.

- Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20 16:58 [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] fscrypt: expose fscrypt_nokey_name Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] fscrypt: add fscrypt_have_same_policy() to check inode compatibility Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 20:52   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] fscrypt: allow fscrypt_generate_iv() to distinguish filenames Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] fscrypt: add extent-based encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:40   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:20     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:45   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-10-20 22:55     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 23:56       ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-21  0:37         ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] fscrypt: document btrfs' fscrypt quirks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:41   ` Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 22:07     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] btrfs: setup qstrings from dentrys using fscrypt helper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:42   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/22] btrfs: store directory encryption state Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] btrfs: disable various operations on encrypted inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] btrfs: start using fscrypt hooks Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] btrfs: add fscrypt_context items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:54   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] btrfs: translate btrfs encryption flags and encrypted inode flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] btrfs: store a fscrypt extent context per normal file extent Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] btrfs: encrypt normal file extent data if appropriate Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-21 20:58   ` Josef Bacik
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] btrfs: Add new FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ENCRYPT feature flag Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] btrfs: implement fscrypt ioctls Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] btrfs: permit searching for nokey names for removal Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] btrfs: use correct name hash for nokey names Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] btrfs: adapt lookup for partially encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] fscrypt: add flag allowing partially-encrypted directories Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 16:58 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] btrfs: encrypt verity items Sweet Tea Dorminy
2022-10-20 21:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: add fscrypt integration Eric Biggers
2022-10-20 23:12   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1HBkva6fzSMpm+P@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).