From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 15:36:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7d48bec-515c-164f-b5ee-1903ef98ef8d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190104132520.GA22613@kroah.com>
On 4.01.19 г. 15:25 ч., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> never do something different based on this.
>
> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Meta-comment, why is there a btrfs debugfs directory at all? All you
> have here is a single "test" file that doesn't do anything except expose
> a variable that never changes. What is this directory and single file
> for? Can I just delete the whole thing?
>
git blame is your friend - 1bae30982bc8 ("btrfs: add simple debugfs
interface")
Apparently David had an idea to do something but it never materialized,
imo the debugfs bits could be removed from sysfs.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-04 13:25 [PATCH] btrfs: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-04 13:36 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2019-01-04 14:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-04 13:44 ` David Sterba
2019-01-14 14:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-24 16:36 ` David Sterba
2019-02-01 9:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7d48bec-515c-164f-b5ee-1903ef98ef8d@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).