From: Kurt Van Dijck <dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Breaking UAPI change?
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324190104.GB3342@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1883346738.111675.1616599858539.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Hello,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:30:58 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> commit f5223e9eee65 ("can: extend sockaddr_can to include j1939 members") increased the size of
> struct sockaddr_can.
> This is a problem for applications which use recvfrom() with addrlen being sizeof(struct sockaddr_can)
> or sizeof(struct sockaddr).
> If such an application was built before the change it will no longer function correctly on newer kernels.
This scenario was identified, and explicitely dealt with.
This requires a tiny bit different code, i.e. net/can/raw.c should use
REQUIRED_SIZE() instead of sizeof() for testing the size of the address
structure.
> In fact I ran into such a scenario and found the said commit later that day.
Looking to the v5.10 kernel (which I happen to have checked out),
your claim indeed seems true, the raw_recvmsg does not (raw_bind and
raw_sendmsg work correct, but that's not important for your problem).
>
> Is this a known issue?
It wasn't, until you found it :-)
> Or is this allowed and application must not use sizeof(struct sockaddr_can) as addrlen?
sizeof(struct sockaddr_can). As you already mentioned, applications may have been built
before the size increase, and so they should not be recompiled.
> If so, what is the proposed way to avoid future breakage?
Your application should not change. Kernel must be fixed.
Kurt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 15:30 Breaking UAPI change? Richard Weinberger
2021-03-24 19:01 ` Kurt Van Dijck [this message]
2021-03-24 19:21 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-24 19:27 ` PATCH: " Kurt Van Dijck
2021-03-24 19:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2021-03-24 20:26 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2021-03-24 21:59 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2021-03-25 8:01 ` Kurt Van Dijck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210324190104.GB3342@x1.vandijck-laurijssen.be \
--to=dev.kurt@vandijck-laurijssen.be \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).