linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mariusz Madej <Mariusz.Madej@xtrack.com>
To: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "dmurphy@ti.com" <dmurphy@ti.com>
Subject: m_can: a lot of 'Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost' in dmesg
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:27:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PR3PR05MB7212376CDA795770B7E625E6809F9@PR3PR05MB7212.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)


Hi,

I have a problem with m_can controller in my sama5d2 processor.
Under heavy can traffic it happens that my device starts to report (dmesg):

[   77.610000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.620000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.630000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.630000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.640000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.640000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.650000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.660000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost
[   77.660000] m_can_platform f8054000.can can0: Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost

what causes large load problem in my system.

I think I have a clue what is going on but my kernel knowledge is low so i want
You to tell me if I am right or not. So:

The only place in m_can.c file, where interrupt register is cleared is function
called when interrupt arrives

static irqreturn_t m_can_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
.
.
        /* ACK all irqs */
        if (ir & IR_ALL_INT)
                m_can_write(cdev, M_CAN_IR, ir);
.
.
}

But when we enter 'NAPI mode' in heavy load we are never get to this function
until load gets lower and interrupts are enabled again. In this situation,
this code:

static int m_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
{
        struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
        u32 pkts = 0;
        u32 rxfs;

        rxfs = m_can_read(cdev, M_CAN_RXF0S);
        if (!(rxfs & RXFS_FFL_MASK)) {
                netdev_dbg(dev, "no messages in fifo0\n");
                return 0;
        }

        while ((rxfs & RXFS_FFL_MASK) && (quota > 0)) {
                if (rxfs & RXFS_RFL)
                        netdev_warn(dev, "Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost\n");

                m_can_read_fifo(dev, rxfs);

                quota--;
                pkts++;
                rxfs = m_can_read(cdev, M_CAN_RXF0S);
        }

        if (pkts)
                can_led_event(dev, CAN_LED_EVENT_RX);

        return pkts;
}

will always have (rxfs & RXFS_RFL) == true until interrupt are enabled again.
That is why we got so many messages in a row for so long time. So clearing
RXFS_RFL bit after warning is issued could be a solution.

Can You tell me if I am right?

Regards
Mariusz

             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-24 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24 14:27 Mariusz Madej [this message]
2021-02-26 13:37 ` m_can: a lot of 'Rx FIFO 0 Message Lost' in dmesg Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-02-27  4:03   ` Mariusz Madej
2021-03-01 14:14     ` Torin Cooper-Bennun
2021-03-01 21:31       ` Mariusz Madej
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-24 11:24 Mariusz Madej

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PR3PR05MB7212376CDA795770B7E625E6809F9@PR3PR05MB7212.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mariusz.madej@xtrack.com \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).