Re: Locking issue between NFSv4 and SMB client

[Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 04:45:22PM -0700, dai.ngo@oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Bruce,

Oops, sorry for neglecting this.

> I'm doing some locking testing between NFSv4 and SMB client and
> think there are some issues on the server that allows both clients
> to lock the same file at the same time.

It's not too surprising to me that getting consistent locks between the
two would be hard.

Did you get any review from a Samba expert?  I seem to recall it having
a lot of options, and I wonder if it's configured correctly for this
case.

It sounds like Samba may be giving out oplocks without getting a lease
from the kernel.

--b.

> Here is what I did:
> 
> NOTE: lck is a simple program that use lockf(3) to lock a file from
> offset 0 to the length specified by '-l'.
> 
> On NFSv4 client
> ---------------
> 
> [root@nfsvmd07 ~]# nfsstat -m
> /tmp/mnt from nfsvmf24:/root/smb_share
> Flags:	rw,relatime,vers=4.1,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,
>        proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=10.80.62.47,
>        local_lock=none,addr=10.80.111.94
> [root@nfsvmd07 ~]#
> 
> 
> [root@nfsvmd07 ~]# ./lck -p /tmp/mnt/messages -W -l 100000000
> Lck/file: 1, Maxlocks: 10000000
> Locking[/tmp/mnt/messages] Offset[0] Len[100000000] N[0]...doing F_LOCK..
> LOCKED...
> 
> Locks[1] files[1] took[2.000s] sleep waiting...Hit Control-C to stop
> 
> [NFS client successfully locks the file]
> 
> On SMB client
> -------------
> 
> [root@nfsvme24 ~]# mount |grep cifs
> //nfsvmf24/smb_share on /tmp/mnt type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.1.1,cache=strict,username=root,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=10.80.111.94,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1)
> [root@nfsvme24 ~]#
> 
> [root@nfsvme24 ~]# smbclient -L nfsvmf24
> Enter SAMBA\root's password:
> 
> 	Sharename       Type      Comment
> 	---------       ----      -------
> 	print$          Disk      Printer Drivers
> 	smb_share       Disk      Test Samba Share       <<===== share to mount
> 	IPC$            IPC       IPC Service (Samba 4.10.16)
> 	root            Disk      Home Directories
> Reconnecting with SMB1 for workgroup listing.
> 
> 	Server               Comment
> 	---------            -------
> 
> 	Workgroup            Master
> 	---------            -------
> [root@nfsvme24 ~]#
> 
> [root@nfsvme24 ~]# ./lck -p /tmp/mnt/messages -W -l 100000000
> Lck/file: 1, Maxlocks: 10000000
> Locking[/tmp/mnt/messages] Offset[0] Len[100000000] N[0]...doing F_LOCK..
> LOCKED...
> 
> Locks[1] files[1] took[2.000s] sleep waiting...Hit Control-C to stop
> 
> [SMB client successfully locks the file]
> 
> The same issue happens when either client locks the file first.
> I think this is what has happened:
> 
> 1. NFSv4 client opens and locks the file first
> 
>     . NFSv4 client send OPEN and LOCK to server, server replies
>       OK on both requests.
> 
>     . SMB client sends create request with Oplock==Lease for
>       the same file.
> 
>     . server holds off on replying to SMB client's create request,
>       recalls delegation from NFSv4 client, waits for NFSv4 client
>       to return the delegation then replies success to SMB client's
>       create request with lease granted (Oplock==Lease).
> 
>       NOTE: I think SMB server should replies the create request
>       with Oplock==None to force the SMB client to sends the
>       lock request.
>
>     . Once SMB client receives the reply of the create with
>       'Oplock==Lease', it assumes it has full control of the file
>       therefor it does not need to send the lock request.
> 
>     . both NFSv4 and SMB client now think they have locked the file.
> 
> pcap:  nfs_lock_smb_lock.pcap
> 
> 2. SMB client creates the file with 'Oplock==Lease' first
> 
>     . SMB sends create request with 'Oplock==Lease' to server,
>       server replies OK with 'Oplock==Lease'. SMB client skips
>       sending lock request since it assumes it has full control
>       of the file with the lease.
> 
>     . NFSv4 client sends OPEN to server, server replies OK with
>       delagation is none. NFSv4 client sends LOCK request, since
>       no lock was created in the kernel for the SMB client, the
>       lock was granted to the NFSv4 client.
> 
>      NOTE: I think the SMB server should send lease break
>      notification to the SMB client, wait for the lease break
>      acknowledgment from SMB client before replying to the
>      OPEN of the NFSv4 client. This will force the SMB client
>      to send the lock request to the server.
> 
>     . both NFSv4 and SMB client now think they have locked the file.
> 
> Your thought?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Dai