linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	samba-technical <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH cifs] cifs: smb3_crypto_shash_allocate can be static
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:00:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mv43iPuAgvM699A5TstZGzHj=WOsYd8ffmk1DSUsQXdrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191104075911.23rhzcbztbhlbjk5@4978f4969bb8>

FYI - I updated cifs-2.6.for-next with the equivalent change (fixing a
line change to one of Aurelien's patches in the multichannel series)

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:59 AM kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Fixes: 4d1cc0309f7e ("cifs: try opening channels after mounting")
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
>  smb2transport.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c b/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> index 1af789871ec2e..86501239cef55 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2transport.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ smb2_crypto_shash_allocate(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>                                &server->secmech.sdeschmacsha256);
>  }
>
> -int
> +static int
>  smb3_crypto_shash_allocate(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>  {
>         struct cifs_secmech *p = &server->secmech;



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-04  7:59 [cifs:for-next 18/20] fs/cifs/smb2transport.c:52:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'smb3_crypto_shash_allocate' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
2019-11-04  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH cifs] cifs: smb3_crypto_shash_allocate can be static kbuild test robot
2019-11-05 23:00   ` Steve French [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAH2r5mv43iPuAgvM699A5TstZGzHj=WOsYd8ffmk1DSUsQXdrA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaptel@suse.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).