* Re: ksmbd,transport_rdma.c: Don't include rwlock.h directly
[not found] ` <51815fbe3e864a0177445b9b17d018a42d603e21.camel@gmx.de>
@ 2021-09-12 3:00 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-09-12 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Galbraith; +Cc: lkml, Hyunchul Lee, CIFS
2021-09-12 11:23 GMT+09:00, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>:
> typing hard.. Thag forget type [patch]
I will apply this patch, Thanks for your patch!
>
> On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 04:19 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>
>> rwlock.h specifically asks to not be included directly.
>>
>> In fact, the proper spinlock.h include isn't needed either,
>> it comes with the huge pile that kthread.h ends up pulling
>> in, so just drop it entirely.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>> ---
>> fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/transport_rdma.c
>> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>> #define SUBMOD_NAME "smb_direct"
>>
>> #include <linux/kthread.h>
>> -#include <linux/rwlock.h>
>> #include <linux/list.h>
>> #include <linux/mempool.h>
>> #include <linux/highmem.h>
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread