Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add uSD and eMMC support for Bubblegum96

From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.liau@actions-semi.com, linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: actions: Add uSD and eMMC support for Bubblegum96
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:08:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381305a-8585-9dcf-6b43-34e852e785ab@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190608195317.6336-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

Hi Mani,

Am 08.06.19 um 21:53 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Add uSD and eMMC support for Bubblegum96 board based on Actions Semi
> Owl SoC.

What information does "based on Actions Semi Owl SoC" give us? :)
The board name should be unique enough - Owl is a family of SoCs,
"actions:" is in the subject and "s900-" is in the filename.

> SD0 is connected to uSD slot and SD2 is connected to eMMC.

Suggest to add that as comments above the two nodes instead.

> Since there is no PMIC support added yet, fixed regulator has been
> used as a regulator node.

Fine with me - maybe add a comment and make sure it's aligned with the
schematics naming wrt PMIC.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../boot/dts/actions/s900-bubblegum-96.dts    | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900-bubblegum-96.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900-bubblegum-96.dts
> index 732daaa6e9d3..3b596d72de25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900-bubblegum-96.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900-bubblegum-96.dts
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
>  
>  	aliases {
>  		serial5 = &uart5;
> +		mmc0 = &mmc0;
> +		mmc1 = &mmc1;
> +		mmc2 = &mmc2;

Sort them alphabetically?

>  	};
>  
>  	chosen {
> @@ -23,6 +26,14 @@
>  		device_type = "memory";
>  		reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
>  	};
> +
> +	reg_3p1v: regulator-3p1v {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		regulator-name = "fixed-3.1V";
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <3100000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <3100000>;
> +		regulator-always-on;
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &i2c0 {
> @@ -241,6 +252,45 @@
>  			bias-pull-up;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	mmc0_default: mmc0_default {
> +		pinmux {
> +			groups = "sd0_d0_mfp", "sd0_d1_mfp", "sd0_d2_d3_mfp",
> +				 "sd0_cmd_mfp", "sd0_clk_mfp";
> +			function = "sd0";
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	mmc2_default: mmc2_default {
> +		pinmux {
> +			groups = "nand0_d0_ceb3_mfp";
> +			function = "sd2";
> +		};
> +	};

Wouldn't it make more sense to move these and the below pinctrl-* to
s900.dtsi for sharing with other theoretical boards? I really dislike
the imx model where pin muxing is duplicated into each individual board.

Regards,
Andreas

> +};
> +
> +&mmc0 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc0_default>;
> +	no-sdio;
> +	no-mmc;
> +	no-1-8-v;
> +	cd-gpios = <&pinctrl 120 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +	bus-width = <4>;
> +	vmmc-supply = <&reg_3p1v>;
> +	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_3p1v>;
> +};
> +
> +&mmc2 {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_default>;
> +	no-sdio;
> +	no-sd;
> +	non-removable;
> +	bus-width = <8>;
> +	vmmc-supply = <&reg_3p1v>;
>  };
>  
>  &timer {

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)