* clk: bcm2835: Checking a clk_register() call in bcm2835_clk_probe()
@ 2019-10-18 18:42 Markus Elfring
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2019-10-18 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-clk, linux-rpi-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list, Eric Anholt, Florian Fainelli,
Matthias Brugger, Maxime Ripard, Michael Turquette,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne, Scott Branden, Stefan Wahren,
Stephen Boyd, Ray Jui
Cc: LKML, kernel-janitors, Aditya Pakki, Kangjie Lu, Navid Emamdoost,
Stephen McCamant
Hello,
I tried another script for the semantic patch language out.
This source code analysis approach points out that the implementation
of the function “bcm2835_clk_probe” contains still
an unchecked call of the member function “clk_register”.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c?id=7571438a4868e7cb09d698ab52e54f9722020eef#n2243
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4-rc2/source/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c#L2243
How do you think about to improve it?
* Which error code would you like to return for a failed
clock registration at this place?
* Will it be needed to delete any information about clocks
as exception handling?
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-10-18 18:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-18 18:42 clk: bcm2835: Checking a clk_register() call in bcm2835_clk_probe() Markus Elfring
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).