linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Caleb Jorden <caljorden@hotmail.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: iwd@lists.01.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issue with iwd + Linux 5.8.3 + WPA Enterprise
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:18:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b34f7644-a495-4845-0a00-0aebf4b9db52@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826055150.2753.90553@ml01.vlan13.01.org>


Dear Caleb,


Thank you for the report. Linux has a no regression policy, so the 
correct forum to report this to is the Linux kernel folks. I am adding 
the crypto and stable folks to the receiver list.

Am 26.08.20 um 07:51 schrieb caljorden@hotmail.com:

> I wanted to note an issue that I have hit with iwd when I upgraded to
> the Linux 5.8.3 stable kernel.  My office network uses WPA Enterprise
> with EAP-PEAPv0 + MSCHAPv2.  When using this office network,
> upgrading to Linux 5.8.3 caused my system to refuse to associate
> successfully to the network.  I get the following in my dmesg logs:
> 
> [   40.846535] wlan0: authenticate with <redacted>:60
> [   40.850570] wlan0: send auth to <redacted>:60 (try 1/3)
> [   40.854627] wlan0: authenticated
> [   40.855992] wlan0: associate with <redacted>:60 (try 1/3)
> [   40.860450] wlan0: RX AssocResp from <redacted>:60 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=11)
> [   40.861620] wlan0: associated
> [   41.886503] wlan0: deauthenticating from <redacted>:60 by local choice (Reason: 23=IEEE8021X_FAILED)
> [   42.360127] wlan0: authenticate with <redacted>:22
> [   42.364584] wlan0: send auth to <redacted>:22 (try 1/3)
> [   42.370821] wlan0: authenticated
> [   42.372658] wlan0: associate with <redacted>:22 (try 1/3)
> [   42.377426] wlan0: RX AssocResp from <redacted>:22 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=15)
> [   42.378607] wlan0: associated
> [   43.402009] wlan0: deauthenticating from <redacted>:22 by local choice (Reason: 23=IEEE8021X_FAILED)
> [   43.875921] wlan0: authenticate with <redacted>:60
> [   43.879988] wlan0: send auth to <redacted>:60 (try 1/3)
> [   43.886244] wlan0: authenticated
> [   43.889273] wlan0: associate with <redacted>:60 (try 1/3)
> [   43.894586] wlan0: RX AssocResp from <redacted>:60 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=11)
> [   43.896077] wlan0: associated
> [   44.918504] wlan0: deauthenticating from <redacted>:60 by local choice (Reason: 23=IEEE8021X_FAILED)
> 
> This continues as long as I let iwd run.
> 
> I downgraded back to Linux 5.8.2, and verified that everything works
> as expected.  I also tried using Linux 5.8.3 on a different system at
> my home, which uses WPA2-PSK.  It worked fine (though it uses an
> Atheros wireless card instead of an Intel card - but I assume that is
> irrelevant).
> 
> I decided to try to figure out what caused the issue in the changes
> for Linux 5.8.3.  I assumed that it was something that changed in the
> crypto interface, which limited my bisection to a very few commits.
> Sure enough, I found that if I revert commit
> e91d82703ad0bc68942a7d91c1c3d993e3ad87f0 (crypto: algif_aead - Only
> wake up when ctx->more is zero), the problem goes away and I am able
> to associate to my WPA Enterprise network successfully, and use it.
> I found that in order to revert this commit, I also first had to
> revert 465c03e999102bddac9b1e132266c232c5456440 (crypto: af_alg - Fix
> regression on empty requests), because the two commits have coupled
> changes.
> 
> I normally would have assumed that this should be sent to the kernel
> list, but I thought I would first mention it here because of what I
> found in some email threads on the Linux-Crypto list about the crypto
> interfaces to the kernel being sub-optimal and needing to be fixed.
> The changes in these commits look like they are just trying to fix
> what could be broken interfaces, so I thought that it would make
> sense to see what the iwd team thinks about the situation first.
> 
> The wireless card I was using during this testing is an Intel
> Wireless 3165 (rev 81).  If there is any additional information I
> could help provide, please let me know.

It’d be great, if you verified, if the problem occurs with Linus’ master 
branch too.


Kind regards,

Paul

       reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200826055150.2753.90553@ml01.vlan13.01.org>
2020-08-26  6:18 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2020-08-26 10:40   ` Issue with iwd + Linux 5.8.3 + WPA Enterprise Ard Biesheuvel
2020-08-26 11:49     ` Herbert Xu
2020-08-26 11:59       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-08-26 12:08         ` Herbert Xu
2020-08-26 12:58           ` Andrew Zaborowski
2020-08-26 13:00             ` Herbert Xu
2020-08-26 13:57               ` Denis Kenzior
2020-08-26 14:19                 ` Herbert Xu
2020-08-26 15:25                   ` Denis Kenzior
2020-08-26 15:42                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-08-26 22:19                       ` Herbert Xu
2020-08-27  6:40                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-08-27  7:14                           ` [v2 PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Work around empty control messages without MSG_MORE Herbert Xu
2020-08-27  7:40                             ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]                         ` <BL0PR11MB329980406FA0A14A8EF61A07B9550@BL0PR11MB3299.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-08-27  7:54                           ` Issue with iwd + Linux 5.8.3 + WPA Enterprise Ard Biesheuvel
2020-08-26 13:29             ` [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Work around empty control messages without MSG_MORE Herbert Xu
2020-08-26 13:56               ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b34f7644-a495-4845-0a00-0aebf4b9db52@molgen.mpg.de \
    --to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=caljorden@hotmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=iwd@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).