linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
To: matthias.bgg@kernel.org, mpm@selenic.com,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, rjui@broadcom.com,
	sbranden@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia.Lawall@inria.fr,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nsaenzjulienne@suse.de,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200: Move enable/disable in separate function
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:32:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe0bd5cf-b48b-d7e6-c20c-6f8d0ae7aeb5@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218105708.28480-2-matthias.bgg@kernel.org>



On 2020-12-18 2:57 a.m., matthias.bgg@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
>
> We are calling the same code for enable and disable the block in various
> parts of the driver. Put that code into a new function to reduce code
> duplication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - rename function to iproc_rng200_enable_set()
> - use u32 value instead of uint32_t
>
>  drivers/char/hw_random/iproc-rng200.c | 35 ++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/iproc-rng200.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/iproc-rng200.c
> index 70cd818a0f31..a43743887db1 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/iproc-rng200.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/iproc-rng200.c
> @@ -53,14 +53,24 @@ struct iproc_rng200_dev {
>  
>  #define to_rng_priv(rng)	container_of(rng, struct iproc_rng200_dev, rng)
>  
> -static void iproc_rng200_restart(void __iomem *rng_base)
> +static void iproc_rng200_enable_set(void __iomem *rng_base, bool enable)
>  {
> -	uint32_t val;
> +	u32 val;
>  
> -	/* Disable RBG */
>  	val = ioread32(rng_base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
>  	val &= ~RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_MASK;
> +
> +	if (enable)
> +		val |= RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_ENABLE;
> +
>  	iowrite32(val, rng_base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> +}
> +
> +static void iproc_rng200_restart(void __iomem *rng_base)
> +{
> +	uint32_t val;
> +
> +	iproc_rng200_enable_set(rng_base, false);
>  
>  	/* Clear all interrupt status */
>  	iowrite32(0xFFFFFFFFUL, rng_base + RNG_INT_STATUS_OFFSET);
> @@ -82,11 +92,7 @@ static void iproc_rng200_restart(void __iomem *rng_base)
>  	val &= ~RBG_SOFT_RESET;
>  	iowrite32(val, rng_base + RBG_SOFT_RESET_OFFSET);
>  
> -	/* Enable RBG */
> -	val = ioread32(rng_base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> -	val &= ~RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_MASK;
> -	val |= RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_ENABLE;
> -	iowrite32(val, rng_base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> +	iproc_rng200_enable_set(rng_base, true);
>  }
>  
>  static int iproc_rng200_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max,
> @@ -153,13 +159,8 @@ static int iproc_rng200_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max,
>  static int iproc_rng200_init(struct hwrng *rng)
>  {
>  	struct iproc_rng200_dev *priv = to_rng_priv(rng);
> -	uint32_t val;
>  
> -	/* Setup RNG. */
> -	val = ioread32(priv->base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> -	val &= ~RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_MASK;
> -	val |= RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_ENABLE;
> -	iowrite32(val, priv->base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> +	iproc_rng200_enable_set(priv->base, true);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -167,12 +168,8 @@ static int iproc_rng200_init(struct hwrng *rng)
>  static void iproc_rng200_cleanup(struct hwrng *rng)
>  {
>  	struct iproc_rng200_dev *priv = to_rng_priv(rng);
> -	uint32_t val;
>  
> -	/* Disable RNG hardware */
> -	val = ioread32(priv->base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> -	val &= ~RNG_CTRL_RNG_RBGEN_MASK;
> -	iowrite32(val, priv->base + RNG_CTRL_OFFSET);
> +	iproc_rng200_enable_set(priv->base, false);
>  }
>  
>  static int iproc_rng200_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18 10:57 [PATCH v2 1/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200: Fix disable of the block matthias.bgg
2020-12-18 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200: Move enable/disable in separate function matthias.bgg
2020-12-18 17:32   ` Scott Branden [this message]
2021-01-02 22:08   ` Herbert Xu
2020-12-18 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] hwrng: iproc-rng200: Fix disable of the block Scott Branden
2020-12-18 17:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-02 22:08 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe0bd5cf-b48b-d7e6-c20c-6f8d0ae7aeb5@broadcom.com \
    --to=scott.branden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@kernel.org \
    --cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).