* [PATCH v5 0/1] fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp
@ 2020-10-13 10:06 Jitao Shi
2020-10-13 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: " Jitao Shi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jitao Shi @ 2020-10-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger, Daniel Vetter,
David Airlie, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Cc: linux-mediatek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, srv_heupstream,
yingjoe.chen, eddie.huang, cawa.cheng, bibby.hsieh, ck.hu,
stonea168, huijuan.xie, Jitao Shi
Changes since v4:
- Merge revert path and fixup patch to on patch
Changes since v3:
- Revert v2, for v2 will cause some bridge ic no output. the cause
the video linetime doesn't match display mode from get mode.
- Make sure the horizontal_frontporch_byte and horizontal_backporch_byte
are > 0.
Jitao Shi (1):
drm/mediatek: dsi: fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
--
2.12.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp
2020-10-13 10:06 [PATCH v5 0/1] fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp Jitao Shi
@ 2020-10-13 10:06 ` Jitao Shi
2020-10-13 10:54 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-29 13:22 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jitao Shi @ 2020-10-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger, Daniel Vetter,
David Airlie, dri-devel, linux-kernel
Cc: linux-mediatek, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, srv_heupstream,
yingjoe.chen, eddie.huang, cawa.cheng, bibby.hsieh, ck.hu,
stonea168, huijuan.xie, Jitao Shi
Replace horizontal_backporch_byte with vm->hback_porch * bpp to aovid
flowing judgement negative number.
if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta)
Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 80b7a082e874..ddddf69ebeaf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+ u32 delta;
struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
@@ -466,50 +467,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
- horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ horizontal_backporch_byte =
+ (vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
else
- horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
+ dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
- timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
-
- if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
-
- horizontal_backporch_byte =
- horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 3;
+
+ delta = (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) ? 18 : 12;
+
+ if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
+ data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) {
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte =
+ vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
+ (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
+ vm->hfront_porch /
+ (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
+
+ horizontal_backporch_byte =
+ horizontal_backporch_byte -
+ (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
+ vm->hback_porch /
+ (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
} else {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
+ dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
}
writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
--
2.12.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp
2020-10-13 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: " Jitao Shi
@ 2020-10-13 10:54 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-29 13:22 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Boichat @ 2020-10-13 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jitao Shi
Cc: Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger, Daniel Vetter,
David Airlie, dri-devel, lkml, Devicetree List, srv_heupstream,
huijuan.xie, stonea168, cawa cheng,
moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, Yingjoe Chen,
Eddie Huang, linux-arm Mailing List
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 6:06 PM Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Replace horizontal_backporch_byte with vm->hback_porch * bpp to aovid
> flowing judgement negative number.
>
> if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
> data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 80b7a082e874..ddddf69ebeaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> + u32 delta;
> struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>
> struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +467,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>
> if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_backporch_byte =
> + (vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
These parentheses are not required, but it might be a little clearer to write:
(vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp) - 10;
> else
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
> + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
ditto:
((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp) - 10;
But then, _maybe_ it's clearer to drop this hunk and just add this
below the if/else:
horizontal_backporch_byte -= 10;
>
> data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> - timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 3;
(for reference, apart from this `+ 3`, there is no functional change
in this hunk: this just moves delta outside of the if/else block,
which is a good idea for readability)
> +
> + delta = (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) ? 18 : 12;
> +
> + if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
> + data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) {
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> + vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> + (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
> + vm->hfront_porch /
> + (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> +
> + horizontal_backporch_byte =
> + horizontal_backporch_byte -
> + (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
> + vm->hback_porch /
> + (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> } else {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> }
>
> writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
> --
> 2.12.5
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp
2020-10-13 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: " Jitao Shi
2020-10-13 10:54 ` Nicolas Boichat
@ 2020-10-29 13:22 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chun-Kuang Hu @ 2020-10-29 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jitao Shi
Cc: Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Matthias Brugger, Daniel Vetter,
David Airlie, DRI Development, linux-kernel, DTML,
srv_heupstream, huijuan.xie, stonea168, cawa.cheng,
moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support, yingjoe.chen,
eddie.huang, Linux ARM
Hi, Jitao:
Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> 於 2020年10月13日 週二 下午6:06寫道：
>
> Replace horizontal_backporch_byte with vm->hback_porch * bpp to aovid
> flowing judgement negative number.
>
> if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
> data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 80b7a082e874..ddddf69ebeaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> + u32 delta;
> struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>
> struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +467,34 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>
> if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_backporch_byte =
> + (vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
> else
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_backporch_byte = ((vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
> + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
>
> data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> - timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 3;
> +
> + delta = (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) ? 18 : 12;
> +
> + if ((vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp + horizontal_backporch_byte) >
> + data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) {
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> + vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> + (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
> + vm->hfront_porch /
> + (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> +
> + horizontal_backporch_byte =
> + horizontal_backporch_byte -
> + (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta) *
> + vm->hback_porch /
> + (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> } else {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
I've applied this patch, but small hbp has problem because
horizontal_backporch_byte < 0.
I try to modify this patch according to two assumption:
1. horizontal_backporch_byte should be smaller than (vm->hback_porch +
vm->hsync_len) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp at least 10.
2. horizontal_backporch_byte should >= 0.
According to these two assumption, I've a patch [1]. My key point is
that I use horizontal_backporch_byte to calculate the ratio to
subtract it. Is my assumption correct?
If not, please explain why do you calculate in this way, so we could
find out how to solve this problem.
[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/2506992
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
> }
>
> writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
> --
> 2.12.5
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-29 13:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-13 10:06 [PATCH v5 0/1] fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp Jitao Shi
2020-10-13 10:06 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] drm/mediatek: dsi: " Jitao Shi
2020-10-13 10:54 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-29 13:22 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).