* [PATCH] ARM: dts: Fix OpenBMC flash layout label addresses
@ 2022-01-05 0:37 Zev Weiss
2022-01-05 5:32 ` [Phishing Risk] [External] " Lei Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zev Weiss @ 2022-01-05 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree
Cc: Rob Herring, Joel Stanley, Troy Lee, linux-kernel, openbmc, Zev Weiss
We've ended up with some inconsistencies between the addresses in the
DT node labels and the actual offsets of the partitions; this brings
them back in sync.
Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
Fixes: 529022738c8e ("ARM: dts: Add OpenBMC flash layout")
Fixes: 8dec60e7b8d0 ("ARM: dts: aspeed: Grow u-boot partition 64MiB OpenBMC flash layout")
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
index 31f59de5190b..7af41361c480 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ rofs@a00000 {
label = "rofs";
};
- rwfs@6000000 {
+ rwfs@2a00000 {
reg = <0x2a00000 0x1600000>; // 22MB
label = "rwfs";
};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
index 6c26524e93e1..b47e14063c38 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ kernel@80000 {
label = "kernel";
};
- rofs@c0000 {
+ rofs@4c0000 {
reg = <0x4c0000 0x1740000>;
label = "rofs";
};
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] [PATCH] ARM: dts: Fix OpenBMC flash layout label addresses
2022-01-05 0:37 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Fix OpenBMC flash layout label addresses Zev Weiss
@ 2022-01-05 5:32 ` Lei Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lei Yu @ 2022-01-05 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zev Weiss; +Cc: devicetree, openbmc, Troy Lee, linux-kernel, Rob Herring
On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:37 AM Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net> wrote:
>
> We've ended up with some inconsistencies between the addresses in the
> DT node labels and the actual offsets of the partitions; this brings
> them back in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@bewilderbeest.net>
> Fixes: 529022738c8e ("ARM: dts: Add OpenBMC flash layout")
> Fixes: 8dec60e7b8d0 ("ARM: dts: aspeed: Grow u-boot partition 64MiB OpenBMC flash layout")
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> index 31f59de5190b..7af41361c480 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ rofs@a00000 {
> label = "rofs";
> };
>
> - rwfs@6000000 {
> + rwfs@2a00000 {
> reg = <0x2a00000 0x1600000>; // 22MB
> label = "rwfs";
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> index 6c26524e93e1..b47e14063c38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ kernel@80000 {
> label = "kernel";
> };
>
> - rofs@c0000 {
> + rofs@4c0000 {
> reg = <0x4c0000 0x1740000>;
> label = "rofs";
> };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Lei YU <yulei.sh@bytedance.com>
--
BRs,
Lei YU
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-05 5:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-05 0:37 [PATCH] ARM: dts: Fix OpenBMC flash layout label addresses Zev Weiss
2022-01-05 5:32 ` [Phishing Risk] [External] " Lei Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).