linux-efi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@csgraf.de>,
	Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arch-agnostic initrd loading method for EFI systems
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:26:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207202637.GA3464906@rani.riverdale.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8Z3=cqbNxspLXAgM_8wEm+to2TWRjpaaC231MbwL2Ycw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 07:47:46PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 18:45, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 02:03:50PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > >   data structure. It also creates a time window where the initrd data sits
> > >   in memory, and can potentially be corrupted before the kernel is booted.
> > >
> >
> > I don't quite understand the time window aspect -- can you expand on
> > that? It seems like the same time window exists between when the kernel
> > is loaded and when it actually runs, no? Why is this more important for
> > initrd?
> 
> When using loadimage+startimage, the authentication and measurement of
> the kernel image occur during the call to loadimage(), even if the
> source of the load is memory itself, and startimage() is typically
> called right after.
> 
> The assumption is that it may help to make this time as short as
> possible for the initrd as well.

Ok, this is for when we can use LoadImage, that makes sense.

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 14:03 [PATCH 0/2] arch-agnostic initrd loading method for EFI systems Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-06 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi/libstub: add support for loading the initrd from a device path Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-06 18:26   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-06 18:46     ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-02-06 19:15       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-06 20:09         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-02-06 22:49           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-07  7:35             ` Ilias Apalodimas
2020-02-06 22:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07  0:01       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-07  0:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07  0:57           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-07  8:12             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 13:30               ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-07 13:58                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 14:18                   ` Alexander Graf
2020-02-07 15:30                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 15:35                     ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-07 11:09       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-07 11:03     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-07  9:48   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-07 12:36     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-10 14:26       ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-09  6:39   ` Lukas Wunner
2020-02-09 11:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-06 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi/libstub: take noinitrd cmdline argument into account for devpath initrd Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-06 18:33   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-02-06 23:44     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-12 16:01   ` Peter Jones
2020-02-07  9:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] arch-agnostic initrd loading method for EFI systems Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-07  9:22   ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-02-07 12:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 16:20       ` James Bottomley
2020-02-07 18:31         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 19:54           ` James Bottomley
2020-02-07 20:03             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 18:45 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-02-07 19:47   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-07 20:26     ` Arvind Sankar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200207202637.GA3464906@rani.riverdale.lan \
    --to=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=leif@nuviainc.com \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).