From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
Cc: linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>,
linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ima: generalize x86/EFI arch glue for other EFI architectures
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:39:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFYimf3vPp5N8xvrJTPf6AN-BCTLkGR4zYtNQWfF04OkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106034126.GA17818@linux-8mug>
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 04:41, Chester Lin <clin@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 11:37:59PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > From: Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
> >
> > Move the x86 IMA arch code into security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c,
> > so that we will be able to wire it up for arm64 in a future patch.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 3 ++
> > arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> > security/integrity/ima/Makefile | 4 ++
> > arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c => security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c | 45 ++++++--------------
> > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> > index 7673dc833232..c98f78330b09 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> > @@ -380,4 +380,7 @@ static inline void efi_fake_memmap_early(void)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#define arch_ima_efi_boot_mode \
> > + ({ extern struct boot_params boot_params; boot_params.secure_boot; })
> > +
> > #endif /* _ASM_X86_EFI_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > index 68608bd892c0..5eeb808eb024 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -161,5 +161,3 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMCONF_FAM10H) += mmconf-fam10h_64.o
> > obj-y += vsmp_64.o
> > endif
> > -
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT) += ima_arch.o
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile
> > index 67dabca670e2..2499f2485c04 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/Makefile
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Makefile
> > @@ -14,3 +14,7 @@ ima-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC) += ima_kexec.o
> > ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += ima_mok.o
> > ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) += ima_asymmetric_keys.o
> > ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_KEYS) += ima_queue_keys.o
> > +
> > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_EFI),y)
> > +ima-$(CONFIG_IMA_SECURE_AND_OR_TRUSTED_BOOT) += ima_efi.o
> > +endif
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> > similarity index 60%
> > rename from arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
> > rename to security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> > index 7dfb1e808928..233627a9d4b8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ima_arch.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_efi.c
> > @@ -5,50 +5,29 @@
> > #include <linux/efi.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/ima.h>
> > +#include <asm/efi.h>
> >
> > -extern struct boot_params boot_params;
> > +#ifndef arch_ima_efi_boot_mode
> > +#define arch_ima_efi_boot_mode efi_secureboot_mode_unknown
>
> I think this should be "efi_secureboot_mode_unset" otherwise the get_sb_mode()
> will never be called. The others look good to me, thanks for your help.
>
Thanks Chester! I will fix that up.
> > +#endif
> >
> > static enum efi_secureboot_mode get_sb_mode(void)
> > {
> > - efi_guid_t efi_variable_guid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID;
> > - efi_status_t status;
> > - unsigned long size;
> > - u8 secboot, setupmode;
> > -
> > - size = sizeof(secboot);
> > + enum efi_secureboot_mode mode;
> >
> > if (!efi_rt_services_supported(EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_VARIABLE)) {
> > pr_info("ima: secureboot mode unknown, no efi\n");
> > return efi_secureboot_mode_unknown;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Get variable contents into buffer */
> > - status = efi.get_variable(L"SecureBoot", &efi_variable_guid,
> > - NULL, &size, &secboot);
> > - if (status == EFI_NOT_FOUND) {
> > + mode = efi_get_secureboot_mode(efi.get_variable);
> > + if (mode == efi_secureboot_mode_disabled)
> > pr_info("ima: secureboot mode disabled\n");
> > - return efi_secureboot_mode_disabled;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > + else if (mode == efi_secureboot_mode_unknown)
> > pr_info("ima: secureboot mode unknown\n");
> > - return efi_secureboot_mode_unknown;
> > - }
> > -
> > - size = sizeof(setupmode);
> > - status = efi.get_variable(L"SetupMode", &efi_variable_guid,
> > - NULL, &size, &setupmode);
> > -
> > - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) /* ignore unknown SetupMode */
> > - setupmode = 0;
> > -
> > - if (secboot == 0 || setupmode == 1) {
> > - pr_info("ima: secureboot mode disabled\n");
> > - return efi_secureboot_mode_disabled;
> > - }
> > -
> > - pr_info("ima: secureboot mode enabled\n");
> > - return efi_secureboot_mode_enabled;
> > + else
> > + pr_info("ima: secureboot mode enabled\n");
> > + return mode;
> > }
> >
> > bool arch_ima_get_secureboot(void)
> > @@ -57,7 +36,7 @@ bool arch_ima_get_secureboot(void)
> > static bool initialized;
> >
> > if (!initialized && efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
> > - sb_mode = boot_params.secure_boot;
> > + sb_mode = arch_ima_efi_boot_mode;
> >
> > if (sb_mode == efi_secureboot_mode_unset)
> > sb_mode = get_sb_mode();
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-06 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-02 22:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] wire up IMA secure boot for arm64 Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-02 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] efi: generalize efi_get_secureboot Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-03 18:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-03 19:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-03 20:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-02 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ima: generalize x86/EFI arch glue for other EFI architectures Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-06 3:41 ` Chester Lin
2020-11-06 6:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-11-02 22:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64/ima: add ima_arch support Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-14 12:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-04 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] wire up IMA secure boot for arm64 Mimi Zohar
2020-11-04 18:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-04 19:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-04 19:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-04 19:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-11-05 7:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMj1kXFYimf3vPp5N8xvrJTPf6AN-BCTLkGR4zYtNQWfF04OkA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clin@suse.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).