* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time @ 2022-06-21 6:48 Chao Liu 2022-06-22 13:42 ` Chao Yu 2022-07-06 14:21 ` Chao Yu 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Liu @ 2022-06-21 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu Cc: Chao Liu, linux-kernel, Wayne Zhang, Yue Hu, linux-f2fs-devel From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> If the inode has the compress flag, it will fail to use 'chattr -c +m' to remove its compress flag and tag no compress flag. However, the same command will be successful when executed again, as shown below: $ touch foo.txt $ chattr +c foo.txt $ chattr -c +m foo.txt chattr: Invalid argument while setting flags on foo.txt $ chattr -c +m foo.txt $ f2fs_io getflags foo.txt get a flag on foo.txt ret=0, flags=nocompression,inline_data Fix this by removing some checks in f2fs_setflags_common() that do not affect the original logic. I go through all the possible scenarios, and the results are as follows. Bold is the only thing that has changed. +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ | | file flags | + command +-----------+-----------+----------+ | | no flag | compr | nocompr | +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ | chattr +c | compr | compr | -EINVAL | | chattr -c | no flag | no flag | nocompr | | chattr +m | nocompr | -EINVAL | nocompr | | chattr -m | no flag | compr | no flag | | chattr +c +m | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | compr | | chattr -c +m | nocompr | *nocompr* | nocompr | | chattr -c -m | no flag | no flag | no flag | +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> --- This patch depends on the the patch "f2fs: allow compression of files without blocks" sent earlier this day. fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c index daaa0dfd2d2e..0c3ae5993b7a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c @@ -1873,10 +1873,7 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { if (!f2fs_disable_compressed_file(inode)) return -EINVAL; - } - if (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) - return -EINVAL; - if (iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { + } else { if (!f2fs_may_compress(inode)) return -EINVAL; if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode)) @@ -1885,10 +1882,6 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) set_compress_context(inode); } } - if ((iflags ^ masked_flags) & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) { - if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) - return -EINVAL; - } fi->i_flags = iflags | (fi->i_flags & ~mask); f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_I_SB(inode), (fi->i_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) && -- 2.36.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time 2022-06-21 6:48 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time Chao Liu @ 2022-06-22 13:42 ` Chao Yu 2022-06-23 4:44 ` Chao Liu 2022-07-06 14:21 ` Chao Yu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2022-06-22 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Liu, Jaegeuk Kim Cc: Chao Liu, linux-kernel, Wayne Zhang, Yue Hu, linux-f2fs-devel On 2022/6/21 14:48, Chao Liu wrote: > From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > If the inode has the compress flag, it will fail to use > 'chattr -c +m' to remove its compress flag and tag no compress flag. > However, the same command will be successful when executed again, > as shown below: > > $ touch foo.txt > $ chattr +c foo.txt > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > chattr: Invalid argument while setting flags on foo.txt > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > $ f2fs_io getflags foo.txt > get a flag on foo.txt ret=0, flags=nocompression,inline_data > > Fix this by removing some checks in f2fs_setflags_common() > that do not affect the original logic. I go through all the > possible scenarios, and the results are as follows. Bold is > the only thing that has changed. > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | | file flags | > + command +-----------+-----------+----------+ > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | chattr +c | compr | compr | -EINVAL | > | chattr -c | no flag | no flag | nocompr | > | chattr +m | nocompr | -EINVAL | nocompr | > | chattr -m | no flag | compr | no flag | > | chattr +c +m | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | > | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | compr | > | chattr -c +m | nocompr | *nocompr* | nocompr | > | chattr -c -m | no flag | no flag | no flag | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") > Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > --- > > This patch depends on the the patch > "f2fs: allow compression of files without blocks" sent earlier this day. > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +-------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index daaa0dfd2d2e..0c3ae5993b7a 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -1873,10 +1873,7 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > if (!f2fs_disable_compressed_file(inode)) > return -EINVAL; > - } > - if (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) > - return -EINVAL; > - if (iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > + } else { > if (!f2fs_may_compress(inode)) > return -EINVAL; > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode)) > @@ -1885,10 +1882,6 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > set_compress_context(inode); > } > } > - if ((iflags ^ masked_flags) & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) { > - if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) > - return -EINVAL; > - } Without above check condition, can we return -EINVAL for the case: chattr +c on file w/ nocompr flag | | no flag | compr | nocompr | +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ | chattr +c | compr | compr | *-EINVAL* | Thanks, > > fi->i_flags = iflags | (fi->i_flags & ~mask); > f2fs_bug_on(F2FS_I_SB(inode), (fi->i_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) && > -- > 2.36.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time 2022-06-22 13:42 ` Chao Yu @ 2022-06-23 4:44 ` Chao Liu 2022-07-06 2:57 ` Chao Liu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Liu @ 2022-06-23 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Yu Cc: Chao Liu, linux-kernel, Wayne Zhang, Yue Hu, Jaegeuk Kim, linux-f2fs-devel On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 09:42:13PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2022/6/21 14:48, Chao Liu wrote: > > From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > > > If the inode has the compress flag, it will fail to use > > 'chattr -c +m' to remove its compress flag and tag no compress flag. > > However, the same command will be successful when executed again, > > as shown below: > > > > $ touch foo.txt > > $ chattr +c foo.txt > > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > > chattr: Invalid argument while setting flags on foo.txt > > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > > $ f2fs_io getflags foo.txt > > get a flag on foo.txt ret=0, flags=nocompression,inline_data > > > > Fix this by removing some checks in f2fs_setflags_common() > > that do not affect the original logic. I go through all the > > possible scenarios, and the results are as follows. Bold is > > the only thing that has changed. > > > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > | | file flags | > > + command +-----------+-----------+----------+ > > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > | chattr +c | compr | compr | -EINVAL | > > | chattr -c | no flag | no flag | nocompr | > > | chattr +m | nocompr | -EINVAL | nocompr | > > | chattr -m | no flag | compr | no flag | > > | chattr +c +m | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | > > | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | compr | > > | chattr -c +m | nocompr | *nocompr* | nocompr | > > | chattr -c -m | no flag | no flag | no flag | > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > > > Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") > > Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > --- > > > > This patch depends on the the patch > > "f2fs: allow compression of files without blocks" sent earlier this day. > > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +-------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > index daaa0dfd2d2e..0c3ae5993b7a 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > @@ -1873,10 +1873,7 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > > if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > > if (!f2fs_disable_compressed_file(inode)) > > return -EINVAL; > > - } > > - if (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - if (iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > > + } else { > > if (!f2fs_may_compress(inode)) > > return -EINVAL; > > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode)) > > @@ -1885,10 +1882,6 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > > set_compress_context(inode); > > } > > } > > - if ((iflags ^ masked_flags) & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) { > > - if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - } > > Without above check condition, can we return -EINVAL for the case: > > chattr +c on file w/ nocompr flag > > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | chattr +c | compr | compr | *-EINVAL* | Yes, we can. chattr(1) grabs flags via GETFLAGS, modifies the result, and passes that to SETFLAGS. If we execute 'chattr +c' on the file with nocompr flag, the iflags will contain both compr and nocompr flags, then be refused by: if ((iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) && (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL)) return -EINVAL; In addition, if iflags has only compr flag, while masked_flags has only nocompr flag for some reason (either because of concurrency of chattr(1) or by a user), I think we need remove nocompr flag and tag compr flag on the file, similar to the following. | | no flag | compr | nocompr | +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | *compr* | Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time 2022-06-23 4:44 ` Chao Liu @ 2022-07-06 2:57 ` Chao Liu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Liu @ 2022-07-06 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Yu, Jaegeuk Kim Cc: Chao Liu, linux-kernel, Wayne Zhang, Yue Hu, linux-f2fs-devel Ping. On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 12:44:40PM +0800, Chao Liu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 09:42:13PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > On 2022/6/21 14:48, Chao Liu wrote: > > > From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > > > > > If the inode has the compress flag, it will fail to use > > > 'chattr -c +m' to remove its compress flag and tag no compress flag. > > > However, the same command will be successful when executed again, > > > as shown below: > > > > > > $ touch foo.txt > > > $ chattr +c foo.txt > > > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > > > chattr: Invalid argument while setting flags on foo.txt > > > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > > > $ f2fs_io getflags foo.txt > > > get a flag on foo.txt ret=0, flags=nocompression,inline_data > > > > > > Fix this by removing some checks in f2fs_setflags_common() > > > that do not affect the original logic. I go through all the > > > possible scenarios, and the results are as follows. Bold is > > > the only thing that has changed. > > > > > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > > | | file flags | > > > + command +-----------+-----------+----------+ > > > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > > | chattr +c | compr | compr | -EINVAL | > > > | chattr -c | no flag | no flag | nocompr | > > > | chattr +m | nocompr | -EINVAL | nocompr | > > > | chattr -m | no flag | compr | no flag | > > > | chattr +c +m | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | > > > | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | compr | > > > | chattr -c +m | nocompr | *nocompr* | nocompr | > > > | chattr -c -m | no flag | no flag | no flag | > > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > > > > > Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > > --- > > > > > > This patch depends on the the patch > > > "f2fs: allow compression of files without blocks" sent earlier this day. > > > > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +-------- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > index daaa0dfd2d2e..0c3ae5993b7a 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > @@ -1873,10 +1873,7 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > > > if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > > > if (!f2fs_disable_compressed_file(inode)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > - } > > > - if (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - if (iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) { > > > + } else { > > > if (!f2fs_may_compress(inode)) > > > return -EINVAL; > > > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && F2FS_HAS_BLOCKS(inode)) > > > @@ -1885,10 +1882,6 @@ static int f2fs_setflags_common(struct inode *inode, u32 iflags, u32 mask) > > > set_compress_context(inode); > > > } > > > } > > > - if ((iflags ^ masked_flags) & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL) { > > > - if (masked_flags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) > > > - return -EINVAL; > > > - } > > > > Without above check condition, can we return -EINVAL for the case: > > > > chattr +c on file w/ nocompr flag > > > > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > | chattr +c | compr | compr | *-EINVAL* | > > Yes, we can. > > chattr(1) grabs flags via GETFLAGS, modifies the result, > and passes that to SETFLAGS. If we execute 'chattr +c' > on the file with nocompr flag, the iflags will > contain both compr and nocompr flags, then be refused by: > > if ((iflags & F2FS_COMPR_FL) && (iflags & F2FS_NOCOMP_FL)) > return -EINVAL; > > In addition, if iflags has only compr flag, while masked_flags > has only nocompr flag for some reason > (either because of concurrency of chattr(1) or by a user), > I think we need remove nocompr flag and tag compr flag on the file, > similar to the following. > > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | *compr* | > > Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time 2022-06-21 6:48 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time Chao Liu 2022-06-22 13:42 ` Chao Yu @ 2022-07-06 14:21 ` Chao Yu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Chao Yu @ 2022-07-06 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Liu, Jaegeuk Kim Cc: Chao Liu, linux-kernel, Wayne Zhang, Yue Hu, linux-f2fs-devel On 2022/6/21 14:48, Chao Liu wrote: > From: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> > > If the inode has the compress flag, it will fail to use > 'chattr -c +m' to remove its compress flag and tag no compress flag. > However, the same command will be successful when executed again, > as shown below: > > $ touch foo.txt > $ chattr +c foo.txt > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > chattr: Invalid argument while setting flags on foo.txt > $ chattr -c +m foo.txt > $ f2fs_io getflags foo.txt > get a flag on foo.txt ret=0, flags=nocompression,inline_data > > Fix this by removing some checks in f2fs_setflags_common() > that do not affect the original logic. I go through all the > possible scenarios, and the results are as follows. Bold is > the only thing that has changed. > > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | | file flags | > + command +-----------+-----------+----------+ > | | no flag | compr | nocompr | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > | chattr +c | compr | compr | -EINVAL | > | chattr -c | no flag | no flag | nocompr | > | chattr +m | nocompr | -EINVAL | nocompr | > | chattr -m | no flag | compr | no flag | > | chattr +c +m | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | -EINVAL | > | chattr +c -m | compr | compr | compr | > | chattr -c +m | nocompr | *nocompr* | nocompr | > | chattr -c -m | no flag | no flag | no flag | > +---------------+-----------+-----------+----------+ > > Fixes: 4c8ff7095bef ("f2fs: support data compression") > Signed-off-by: Chao Liu <liuchao@coolpad.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-07-06 14:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-06-21 6:48 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to remove F2FS_COMPR_FL and tag F2FS_NOCOMP_FL at the same time Chao Liu 2022-06-22 13:42 ` Chao Yu 2022-06-23 4:44 ` Chao Liu 2022-07-06 2:57 ` Chao Liu 2022-07-06 14:21 ` Chao Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).