* [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove useless truncate in f2fs_collapse_range()
@ 2020-06-13 4:25 Wei Fang
2020-06-15 1:42 ` Chao Yu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2020-06-13 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-f2fs-devel
Since offset < new_size, no need to do truncate_pagecache() again
with new_size.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 3268f8dd59bb..43544817238b 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -1368,13 +1368,12 @@ static int f2fs_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
return ret;
/* write out all moved pages, if possible */
- down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, offset, LLONG_MAX);
+
+ down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
truncate_pagecache(inode, offset);
new_size = i_size_read(inode) - len;
- truncate_pagecache(inode, new_size);
-
ret = f2fs_truncate_blocks(inode, new_size, true);
up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
if (!ret)
--
2.21.3
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove useless truncate in f2fs_collapse_range()
2020-06-13 4:25 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove useless truncate in f2fs_collapse_range() Wei Fang
@ 2020-06-15 1:42 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-15 7:34 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2020-06-15 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Fang, linux-f2fs-devel
Hi Wei Fang,
On 2020/6/13 12:25, Wei Fang wrote:
> Since offset < new_size, no need to do truncate_pagecache() again
> with new_size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 3268f8dd59bb..43544817238b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1368,13 +1368,12 @@ static int f2fs_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
> return ret;
>
> /* write out all moved pages, if possible */
> - down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, offset, LLONG_MAX);
> +
> + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
I guess this patch mainly avoids useless page cache truncation, could we get rid of
lock coverage update here? or we can do it in separated patch if necessary.
Thanks,
> truncate_pagecache(inode, offset);
>
> new_size = i_size_read(inode) - len;
> - truncate_pagecache(inode, new_size);
> -
> ret = f2fs_truncate_blocks(inode, new_size, true);
> up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> if (!ret)
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove useless truncate in f2fs_collapse_range()
2020-06-15 1:42 ` Chao Yu
@ 2020-06-15 7:34 ` Wei Fang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Fang @ 2020-06-15 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu, linux-f2fs-devel
On 2020/6/15 9:42, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Wei Fang,
>
> On 2020/6/13 12:25, Wei Fang wrote:
>> Since offset < new_size, no need to do truncate_pagecache() again
>> with new_size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> index 3268f8dd59bb..43544817238b 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
>> @@ -1368,13 +1368,12 @@ static int f2fs_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
>> return ret;
>>
>> /* write out all moved pages, if possible */
>> - down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
>> filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, offset, LLONG_MAX);
>> +
>> + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> I guess this patch mainly avoids useless page cache truncation, could we get rid of
> lock coverage update here? or we can do it in separated patch if necessary.
OK, I'll remove the lock coverage change in this patch.
Thanks,
Wei
> Thanks,
>
>> truncate_pagecache(inode, offset);
>>
>> new_size = i_size_read(inode) - len;
>> - truncate_pagecache(inode, new_size);
>> -
>> ret = f2fs_truncate_blocks(inode, new_size, true);
>> up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
>> if (!ret)
>>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-15 7:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-06-13 4:25 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove useless truncate in f2fs_collapse_range() Wei Fang
2020-06-15 1:42 ` Chao Yu
2020-06-15 7:34 ` Wei Fang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).