linux-f2fs-devel.lists.sourceforge.net archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix checkpoint mount option wrong combination
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:41:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACOAw_yqMnjN60F2q7eyWy6zaPK+pTVYheQeHteYhjEHDP-kJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_xW1NM4bXdzkFi7ee-OuZJ093Kz+-Zbk0huwAFHafXvbw@mail.gmail.com>

For less confusion, I am going to separate the "merge" option from
"checkpoint=".
I am adding another "ckpt_merge" option. :)

2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오전 8:33, Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
> The rightmost one is the final option. And checkpoint=merge means
> checkpoint is enabled with a checkpoint thread.
>
> mount checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge => checkpoint=merge
> remount checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge => checkpoint=merge
> remount checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=disable => checkpoint=disable
> remount checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable => checkpoint=enable
>
> Like
>
> mount fsync_mode=posix, fsync_mode=strict, fsync_mode=nobarrier =>
> fsync_mode=nobarrier
>
> 2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오전 5:11, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>님이 작성:
> >
> > On 02/01, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > > Actually, I think we need to select one among them, disable, enable
> > > and merge. I realized my previous understanding about that was wrong.
> > > In that case of "checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable", the last option
> > > will override the ones before that.
> > > This is how the other mount options like fsync_mode, whint_mode and etc.
> > > So, the answer will be "checkpoint=enable". What do you think?
> >
> > We need to clarify a bit more. :)
> >
> > mount checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge
> > remount checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge
> >
> > Then, is it going to enable checkpoint with a thread?
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2021년 2월 1일 (월) 오후 9:40, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>님이 작성:
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/2/1 8:06, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > > > > From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to
> > > > > checkpoint had been mixed up. Fixed it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 +++++------
> > > > >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > > index 56696f6cfa86..8231c888c772 100644
> > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > > @@ -930,20 +930,25 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> > > > >                               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >                       F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc = arg;
> > > > >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > >                       break;
> > > > >               case Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap:
> > > > >                       if (args->from && match_int(args, &arg))
> > > > >                               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >                       F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap = arg;
> > > > >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > >                       break;
> > > > >               case Opt_checkpoint_disable:
> > > > >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > >                       break;
> > > > >               case Opt_checkpoint_enable:
> > > > >                       clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > >
> > > > What if: -o checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
> > > >
> > > > Can you please explain the rule of merge/disable/enable combination and their
> > > > result? e.g.
> > > > checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
> > > > checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge
> > > > checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=disable
> > > > checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge
> > > >
> > > > If the rule/result is clear, it should be documented.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >                       break;
> > > > >               case Opt_checkpoint_merge:
> > > > > +                     clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > >                       set_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> > > > >                       break;
> > > > >   #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> > > > > @@ -1142,12 +1147,6 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> > > > >               return -EINVAL;
> > > > >       }
> > > > >
> > > > > -     if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
> > > > > -                     test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > > > > -             f2fs_err(sbi, "checkpoint=merge cannot be used with checkpoint=disable\n");
> > > > > -             return -EINVAL;
> > > > > -     }
> > > > > -
> > > > >       /* Not pass down write hints if the number of active logs is lesser
> > > > >        * than NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE.
> > > > >        */
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02  0:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01  0:06 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix checkpoint mount option wrong combination Daeho Jeong
2021-02-01 12:40 ` Chao Yu
2021-02-01 13:11   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-02-01 20:11     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-02-01 23:33       ` Daeho Jeong
2021-02-02  0:41         ` Daeho Jeong [this message]
2021-02-02  1:32           ` Chao Yu
2021-02-02  1:28     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACOAw_yqMnjN60F2q7eyWy6zaPK+pTVYheQeHteYhjEHDP-kJA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).