linux-fbdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API
@ 2021-11-01 13:19 Maíra Canal
  2021-11-02 16:00 ` Daniel Thompson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maíra Canal @ 2021-11-01 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lee.jones, daniel.thompson, jingoohan1, thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig
  Cc: dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-kernel, linux-pwm

Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
replace it for the atomic PWM API.

Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
---
V1 -> V2: Initialize variable and simply conditional loop
V2 -> V3: Fix assignment of NULL variable
V3 -> V4: Replace division for pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle
---
 drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
index e94932c69f54..bbf24564082a 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
@@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static int lp855x_configure(struct lp855x *lp)
 
 static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
 {
-	unsigned int period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
-	unsigned int duty = br * period / max_br;
 	struct pwm_device *pwm;
+	struct pwm_state state;
 
 	/* request pwm device with the consumer name */
 	if (!lp->pwm) {
@@ -245,18 +244,15 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
 
 		lp->pwm = pwm;
 
-		/*
-		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
-		 * the atomic PWM API.
-		 */
-		pwm_apply_args(pwm);
+		pwm_init_state(lp->pwm, &state);
+		state.period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
 	}
 
-	pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period);
-	if (duty)
-		pwm_enable(lp->pwm);
-	else
-		pwm_disable(lp->pwm);
+	pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state);
+	pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, br, max_br);
+	state.enabled = state.duty_cycle;
+
+	pwm_apply_state(lp->pwm, &state);
 }
 
 static int lp855x_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API
  2021-11-01 13:19 [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API Maíra Canal
@ 2021-11-02 16:00 ` Daniel Thompson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Thompson @ 2021-11-02 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maíra Canal
  Cc: lee.jones, jingoohan1, thierry.reding, u.kleine-koenig,
	dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-kernel, linux-pwm

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:19:21AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <maira.canal@usp.br>
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Initialize variable and simply conditional loop
> V2 -> V3: Fix assignment of NULL variable
> V3 -> V4: Replace division for pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 20 ++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> index e94932c69f54..bbf24564082a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static int lp855x_configure(struct lp855x *lp)
>  
>  static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
>  {
> -	unsigned int period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
> -	unsigned int duty = br * period / max_br;
>  	struct pwm_device *pwm;
> +	struct pwm_state state;
>  
>  	/* request pwm device with the consumer name */
>  	if (!lp->pwm) {
> @@ -245,18 +244,15 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
>  
>  		lp->pwm = pwm;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
> -		 * the atomic PWM API.
> -		 */
> -		pwm_apply_args(pwm);
> +		pwm_init_state(lp->pwm, &state);
> +		state.period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
>  	}
>  
> -	pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period);
> -	if (duty)
> -		pwm_enable(lp->pwm);
> -	else
> -		pwm_disable(lp->pwm);
> +	pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state);

Should this be:

	} else {
		pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, &state);
	}

As currently written this will clobber the state.period that was set
above.


Daniel.


> +	pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(&state, br, max_br);
> +	state.enabled = state.duty_cycle;
> +
> +	pwm_apply_state(lp->pwm, &state);
>  }
>  
>  static int lp855x_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-02 16:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-01 13:19 [PATCH v4] backlight: lp855x: Switch to atomic PWM API Maíra Canal
2021-11-02 16:00 ` Daniel Thompson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).