Re: [PATCH] fpga: stratix10-soc: Fix comments typo

[Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>]

On 2022-08-27 at 14:46:37 +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> On 27/08/2022 15:22, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On 2022-08-25 at 10:41:55 -0400, Shaomin Deng wrote:
> >> Delete the repeated word "if" in comments.
> > 
> > Please don't duplicate similar patches.
> 
> It probably is not the right fix either...
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shaomin Deng <dengshaomin@cdjrlc.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> >> index 357cea58ec98..e4f2e83a615b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/fpga/stratix10-soc.c
> >> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int s10_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf,
> >>  
> >>  	/*
> >>  	 * Loop waiting for buffers to be returned.  When a buffer is returned,
> >> -	 * reuse it to send more data or free if if all data has been sent.
> >> +	 * reuse it to send more data or free if all data has been sent.
> 
> s/free if if/free it if

You are right. Thanks for your review.

> 
> Not sure if the cdjrlc people are scripting these duplicate word removals
> but if so, they should check the output before sending b/c this seems to
> happen a lot.

They should. Scripting patches and sent without check is actually not a
good idea.

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.
> 
> >>  	 */
> >>  	while (count > 0 || s10_free_buffer_count(mgr) != NUM_SVC_BUFS) {
> >>  		reinit_completion(&priv->status_return_completion);
> >> -- 
> >> 2.35.1
> >>