linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fscrypt: remove struct fscrypt_ctx
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:28:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021202811.GB122863@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009234038.224587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:40:38PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> Now that ext4 and f2fs implement their own post-read workflow that
> supports both fscrypt and fsverity, the fscrypt-only workflow based
> around struct fscrypt_ctx is no longer used.  So remove the unused code.
> 
> This is based on a patch from Chandan Rajendra's "Consolidate FS read
> I/O callbacks code" patchset, but rebased onto the latest kernel, folded
> __fscrypt_decrypt_bio() into fscrypt_decrypt_bio(), cleaned up
> fscrypt_initialize(), and updated the commit message.
> 
> Originally-from: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Applied to fscrypt.git for 5.5.

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: remove struct fscrypt_ctx
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:28:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021202811.GB122863@gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191021202812.clUfavebHcc_LJVCb4iB4NzvGYiGEbHQnCVYJcnQhFA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009234038.224587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:40:38PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> Now that ext4 and f2fs implement their own post-read workflow that
> supports both fscrypt and fsverity, the fscrypt-only workflow based
> around struct fscrypt_ctx is no longer used.  So remove the unused code.
> 
> This is based on a patch from Chandan Rajendra's "Consolidate FS read
> I/O callbacks code" patchset, but rebased onto the latest kernel, folded
> __fscrypt_decrypt_bio() into fscrypt_decrypt_bio(), cleaned up
> fscrypt_initialize(), and updated the commit message.
> 
> Originally-from: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Applied to fscrypt.git for 5.5.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-21 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 23:40 [PATCH] fscrypt: remove struct fscrypt_ctx Eric Biggers
2019-10-21 20:28 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-10-21 20:28   ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191021202811.GB122863@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).