From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:37:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <094a8bcc-33eb-5443-77b3-4e81e0c2d5bf@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUXEz7ZxmkV5bw5O2ORjF4bwDXBMyj3Wk_HST98gMPt97g@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/14/23 12:24, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Example #1: binutils packages
>
> Checking available binutils package for Debian/unstable IA64 (version:
> 2.39.90.20230110-1):
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/binutils <--- Clearly states IA64 as
> "unofficial port"
And?
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/ia64/binutils/filelist
>
> Example #2: linux-image packages
>
> Cannot say what this means...
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?arch=amd64&keywords=linux-image
> (AMD64 - matches)
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?arch=ia64&keywords=linux-image
> (IA64 - no matches)
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?arch=ia64&keywords=linux (IA64 -
> matches - but no linux-image which ships normally a bootable
> Linux-kernel)
No, the package is called "linux-image-$ARCH-$FLAVOR". There is no "linux-image"
package for amd64 either. Does that prove amd64 is dead?
What you are looking for can be found here:
> http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports/pool-ia64/main/l/linux/
> As stated I have no expertise in Debian whatever release for IA64 arch.
Well, maybe let me answer the questions then since I am maintaining the port
in Debian.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 23:36 lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:30 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 7:55 ` ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 16:17 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 20:49 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:03 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:04 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-13 23:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-14 11:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-15 0:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-15 12:04 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-16 9:42 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:41 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 13:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 9:40 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2023-01-16 9:32 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 1:12 ` lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 9:46 ` Will Deacon
2023-01-13 3:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 4:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 5:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-16 14:08 ` Memory transaction instructions David Howells
2023-01-16 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-18 9:05 ` David Howells
2023-01-19 1:41 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 10:23 ` lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-13 18:44 ` [PATCH] lockref: stop doing cpu_relax in the cmpxchg loop Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=094a8bcc-33eb-5443-77b3-4e81e0c2d5bf@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jan.glauber@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).