linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-security-module, Jan Kara

  Hello,

  warning in XFS made me look into detail into how clearing of suid / sgid
bits and security labels is done. And I've spotted a few issues:
1) MS_NOSEC handling is broken - we set it after each file_remove_suid() call.
   However we needn't have removed suid bit simply because we have
   CAP_SYS_FSID and further writes to the file from processes without this
   capability still need to clear the suid bit.
2) file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it also handles removing of
   security labels. It is even more confusing because should_remove_suid()
   doesn't return whether file_remove_suid() is needed or not.
3) On truncate we do clear suid bits but not security labels. According to
   documentation in include/linux/security.h that's a bug but please correct
   me if I'm wrong.
4) ocfs2 doesn't clear security labels - hard to fix, I left it alone for now.
5) XFS didn't provide proper exclusion for clearing mode bits.

  This series aims at fixing above issues.

  Since v1 I have removed bogus patch changing inode_set_flags(), I have
updated changelog of patch 4/5 to better explain why ->inode_killpriv should
be called and I have included a fix for MS_NOSEC handling in this series.
Al, can you please merge the patches? Thanks!

								Honza

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 ` Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, Jan Kara, stable, xfs

file_remove_suid() could mistakenly set S_NOSEC inode bit when root was
modifying the file. As a result following writes to the file by ordinary
user would avoid clearing suid or sgid bits.

Fix the bug by checking actual mode bits before setting S_NOSEC.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 26753ba7b6d6..f5e01704a5c8 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1631,7 +1631,8 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
 		error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
 	if (!error && killsuid)
 		error = __remove_suid(dentry, killsuid);
-	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC))
+	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC) &&
+	    !is_sxid(inode->i_mode))
 		inode->i_flags |= S_NOSEC;
 
 	return error;
-- 
1.8.4.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs()
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 ` Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, Jan Kara, xfs

file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it removes also security related
xattrs and sets S_NOSEC flag. Also should_remove_suid() tells something
else than whether file_remove_suid() call is necessary which leads to
bugs.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c    |  2 +-
 fs/ceph/file.c     |  2 +-
 fs/fuse/file.c     |  2 +-
 fs/inode.c         | 13 ++++++++-----
 fs/ntfs/file.c     |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c  |  2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h |  2 +-
 mm/filemap.c       |  2 +-
 mm/filemap_xip.c   |  2 +-
 9 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index a18ceabd99a8..123795de7103 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
 
 	iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
 
-	err = file_remove_suid(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err) {
 		mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 		goto out;
diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
index d7e0da8366e6..566c04d7ce68 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/file.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
@@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 		goto out;
 	iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
 
-	err = file_remove_suid(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index caa8d95b24e8..dca9311e628f 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 		goto out;
 
 	iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
-	err = file_remove_suid(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index f5e01704a5c8..fcc0886c5824 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1610,7 +1610,11 @@ static int __remove_suid(struct dentry *dentry, int kill)
 	return notify_change(dentry, &newattrs, NULL);
 }
 
-int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
+/*
+ * Remove special file priviledges (suid, security tags) when file is written
+ * to or truncated.
+ */
+int file_remove_privs(struct file *file)
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
@@ -1637,7 +1641,7 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
 
 	return error;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_remove_suid);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_remove_privs);
 
 /**
  *	file_update_time	-	update mtime and ctime time
@@ -1906,9 +1910,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_dio_done);
  * inode is being instantiated).  The reason for the cmpxchg() loop
  * --- which wouldn't be necessary if all code paths which modify
  * i_flags actually followed this rule, is that there is at least one
- * code path which doesn't today --- for example,
- * __generic_file_aio_write() calls file_remove_suid() without holding
- * i_mutex --- so we use cmpxchg() out of an abundance of caution.
+ * code path which doesn't today so we use cmpxchg() out of an abundance
+ * of caution.
  *
  * In the long run, i_mutex is overkill, and we should probably look
  * at using the i_lock spinlock to protect i_flags, and then make sure
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
index 643faa44f22b..d9b8f3d953a9 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
@@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ static ssize_t ntfs_file_aio_write_nolock(struct kiocb *iocb,
 		goto out;
 	if (!count)
 		goto out;
-	err = file_remove_suid(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 	err = file_update_time(file);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index eb596b419942..5c9e8296ebb3 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ restart:
 	 * setgid bits if the process is not being run by root.  This keeps
 	 * people from modifying setuid and setgid binaries.
 	 */
-	return file_remove_suid(file);
+	return file_remove_privs(file);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 9ab779e8a63c..96b2d6a9a6cb 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2428,7 +2428,7 @@ extern struct inode *new_inode_pseudo(struct super_block *sb);
 extern struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb);
 extern void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode);
 extern int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *);
-extern int file_remove_suid(struct file *);
+extern int file_remove_privs(struct file *);
 
 extern void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *, unsigned long hashval);
 static inline void insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 14b4642279f1..da23d6fc102c 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2580,7 +2580,7 @@ ssize_t __generic_file_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 
 	iov_iter_truncate(from, count);
 
-	err = file_remove_suid(file);
+	err = file_remove_privs(file);
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
diff --git a/mm/filemap_xip.c b/mm/filemap_xip.c
index d8d9fe3f685c..8c0425b20b8a 100644
--- a/mm/filemap_xip.c
+++ b/mm/filemap_xip.c
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ xip_file_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t len,
 	if (count == 0)
 		goto out_backing;
 
-	ret = file_remove_suid(filp);
+	ret = file_remove_privs(filp);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_backing;
 
-- 
1.8.4.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 ` Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, Jan Kara, xfs

Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything.
Currently we only have should_remove_suid() and that does something
slightly different.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/fs.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index fcc0886c5824..77942fac4121 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1598,7 +1598,32 @@ int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *dentry)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(should_remove_suid);
 
-static int __remove_suid(struct dentry *dentry, int kill)
+/*
+ * Return mask of changes for notify_change() that need to be done as a
+ * response to write or truncate. Return 0 if nothing has to be changed.
+ * Negative value on error (change should be denied).
+ */
+int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
+	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+	int mask = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_NOSEC(inode))
+		return 0;
+
+	mask = should_remove_suid(dentry);
+	ret = security_inode_need_killpriv(dentry);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+	if (ret)
+		mask |= ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
+	return mask;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_needs_remove_privs);
+
+static int __remove_privs(struct dentry *dentry, int kill)
 {
 	struct iattr newattrs;
 
@@ -1618,23 +1643,18 @@ int file_remove_privs(struct file *file)
 {
 	struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
-	int killsuid;
-	int killpriv;
+	int kill;
 	int error = 0;
 
 	/* Fast path for nothing security related */
 	if (IS_NOSEC(inode))
 		return 0;
 
-	killsuid = should_remove_suid(dentry);
-	killpriv = security_inode_need_killpriv(dentry);
-
-	if (killpriv < 0)
-		return killpriv;
-	if (killpriv)
-		error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
-	if (!error && killsuid)
-		error = __remove_suid(dentry, killsuid);
+	kill = file_needs_remove_privs(file);
+	if (kill < 0)
+		return kill;
+	if (kill)
+		error = __remove_privs(dentry, kill);
 	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC) &&
 	    !is_sxid(inode->i_mode))
 		inode->i_flags |= S_NOSEC;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 96b2d6a9a6cb..aac707cced66 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2429,6 +2429,7 @@ extern struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb);
 extern void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode);
 extern int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *);
 extern int file_remove_privs(struct file *);
+extern int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file);
 
 extern void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *, unsigned long hashval);
 static inline void insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode)
-- 
1.8.4.5

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 ` Jan Kara
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
  2015-01-08  9:18 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-security-module, Jan Kara

Comment in include/linux/security.h says that ->inode_killpriv() should
be call when setuid bit is being removed and that similar security
labels should be removed at this time as well. However we don't call
->inode_killpriv() when we remove suid bit on truncate.

We fix the problem by calling ->inode_need_killpriv() and subsequently
->inode_killpriv() on truncate the same way as we do it on file write.

After this patch there's only one user of should_remove_suid() - ocfs2 -
and indeed it's buggy because it doesn't clear security attributes on
write. However fixing it is difficult because of special locking
constraints.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c         | 5 ++---
 fs/open.c          | 6 ++++--
 include/linux/fs.h | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 77942fac4121..b5211a541437 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1603,9 +1603,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(should_remove_suid);
  * response to write or truncate. Return 0 if nothing has to be changed.
  * Negative value on error (change should be denied).
  */
-int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file)
+int dentry_needs_remove_privs(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
-	struct dentry *dentry = file->f_path.dentry;
 	struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
 	int mask = 0;
 	int ret;
@@ -1621,7 +1620,7 @@ int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file)
 		mask |= ATTR_KILL_PRIV;
 	return mask;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_needs_remove_privs);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dentry_needs_remove_privs);
 
 static int __remove_privs(struct dentry *dentry, int kill)
 {
diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index de92c13b58be..e4e0863855d0 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ int do_truncate(struct dentry *dentry, loff_t length, unsigned int time_attrs,
 		newattrs.ia_valid |= ATTR_FILE;
 	}
 
-	/* Remove suid/sgid on truncate too */
-	ret = should_remove_suid(dentry);
+	/* Remove suid/sgid and security markings on truncate too */
+	ret = dentry_needs_remove_privs(dentry);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 	if (ret)
 		newattrs.ia_valid |= ret | ATTR_FORCE;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index aac707cced66..c5ccc311e8fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2429,7 +2429,11 @@ extern struct inode *new_inode(struct super_block *sb);
 extern void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode);
 extern int should_remove_suid(struct dentry *);
 extern int file_remove_privs(struct file *);
-extern int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file);
+extern int dentry_needs_remove_privs(struct dentry *dentry);
+static inline int file_needs_remove_privs(struct file *file)
+{
+	return dentry_needs_remove_privs(file->f_path.dentry);
+}
 
 extern void __insert_inode_hash(struct inode *, unsigned long hashval);
 static inline void insert_inode_hash(struct inode *inode)
-- 
1.8.4.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
@ 2014-12-18 12:49 ` Jan Kara
  2015-01-08  9:18 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2014-12-18 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-security-module, Jan Kara

Currently XFS calls file_remove_privs() without holding i_mutex. This is
wrong because that function can end up messing with file permissions and
security xattrs for which we need i_mutex held.

Fix the problem by grabbing iolock exclusively when we will need to
change anything in permissions / xattrs.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 5c9e8296ebb3..c6622aa1f8af 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -521,6 +521,13 @@ restart:
 	if (error)
 		return error;
 
+	/* For changing security info in file_remove_privs() we need i_mutex */
+	if (*iolock == XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED && !IS_NOSEC(inode)) {
+		xfs_rw_iunlock(ip, *iolock);
+		*iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
+		xfs_rw_ilock(ip, *iolock);
+		goto restart;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * If the offset is beyond the size of the file, we need to zero any
 	 * blocks that fall between the existing EOF and the start of this
@@ -557,7 +564,9 @@ restart:
 	 * setgid bits if the process is not being run by root.  This keeps
 	 * people from modifying setuid and setgid binaries.
 	 */
-	return file_remove_privs(file);
+	if (!IS_NOSEC(inode))
+		return file_remove_privs(file);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.8.4.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels
  2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
@ 2015-01-08  9:18 ` Jan Kara
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-01-08  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, xfs, linux-security-module, Jan Kara

  Hello!

  Al, can you have a look at these fixes please? Thanks!

								Honza

On Thu 18-12-14 13:49:01, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>   warning in XFS made me look into detail into how clearing of suid / sgid
> bits and security labels is done. And I've spotted a few issues:
> 1) MS_NOSEC handling is broken - we set it after each file_remove_suid() call.
>    However we needn't have removed suid bit simply because we have
>    CAP_SYS_FSID and further writes to the file from processes without this
>    capability still need to clear the suid bit.
> 2) file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it also handles removing of
>    security labels. It is even more confusing because should_remove_suid()
>    doesn't return whether file_remove_suid() is needed or not.
> 3) On truncate we do clear suid bits but not security labels. According to
>    documentation in include/linux/security.h that's a bug but please correct
>    me if I'm wrong.
> 4) ocfs2 doesn't clear security labels - hard to fix, I left it alone for now.
> 5) XFS didn't provide proper exclusion for clearing mode bits.
> 
>   This series aims at fixing above issues.
> 
>   Since v1 I have removed bogus patch changing inode_set_flags(), I have
> updated changelog of patch 4/5 to better explain why ->inode_killpriv should
> be called and I have included a fix for MS_NOSEC handling in this series.
> Al, can you please merge the patches? Thanks!
> 
> 								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling
  2015-05-21 14:05 [PATCH 0/5 v4] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
@ 2015-05-21 14:05 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-05-21 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-fsdevel, dchinner, Serge Hallyn,
	linux-security-module, Jan Kara, stable

file_remove_suid() could mistakenly set S_NOSEC inode bit when root was
modifying the file. As a result following writes to the file by ordinary
user would avoid clearing suid or sgid bits.

Fix the bug by checking actual mode bits before setting S_NOSEC.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ea37cd17b53f..6e342cadef81 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1693,8 +1693,8 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
 		error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
 	if (!error && killsuid)
 		error = __remove_suid(dentry, killsuid);
-	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC))
-		inode->i_flags |= S_NOSEC;
+	if (!error)
+		inode_has_no_xattr(inode);
 
 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling
  2015-05-19  9:46 [PATCH 0/5 v3] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
@ 2015-05-19  9:46 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-05-19  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-fsdevel, dchinner, Serge Hallyn,
	linux-security-module, Jan Kara, stable

file_remove_suid() could mistakenly set S_NOSEC inode bit when root was
modifying the file. As a result following writes to the file by ordinary
user would avoid clearing suid or sgid bits.

Fix the bug by checking actual mode bits before setting S_NOSEC.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index ea37cd17b53f..6e342cadef81 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1693,8 +1693,8 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
 		error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
 	if (!error && killsuid)
 		error = __remove_suid(dentry, killsuid);
-	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC))
-		inode->i_flags |= S_NOSEC;
+	if (!error)
+		inode_has_no_xattr(inode);
 
 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.1.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling
  2015-03-03 10:38 [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] " Jan Kara
@ 2015-03-03 10:38 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-03-03 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, xfs, Jan Kara, stable

file_remove_suid() could mistakenly set S_NOSEC inode bit when root was
modifying the file. As a result following writes to the file by ordinary
user would avoid clearing suid or sgid bits.

Fix the bug by checking actual mode bits before setting S_NOSEC.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/inode.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index f00b16f45507..be326ae7f880 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1693,7 +1693,8 @@ int file_remove_suid(struct file *file)
 		error = security_inode_killpriv(dentry);
 	if (!error && killsuid)
 		error = __remove_suid(dentry, killsuid);
-	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC))
+	if (!error && (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOSEC) &&
+	    !is_sxid(inode->i_mode))
 		inode->i_flags |= S_NOSEC;
 
 	return error;
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-21 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-18 12:49 [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
2014-12-18 12:49 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
2015-01-08  9:18 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] " Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2015-05-19  9:46 [PATCH 0/5 v3] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2015-05-19  9:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2015-05-21 14:05 [PATCH 0/5 v4] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2015-05-21 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).