Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode

From: "Kani, Toshi" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
To: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"snitzer@redhat.com" <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pmem: only set QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for fsdax mode
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:42:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1530207635.14039.308.camel@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180626220430.GA4269@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 16:04 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 02:51:52PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Kani, Toshi <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:28 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Kani, Toshi <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:02 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Kani, Toshi <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [..]
> > > > > > > When this dm change was made, the pmem driver supported DAX for both raw
> > > > > > > and memory modes (note: sector mode does not use the pmem driver).  I
> > > > > > > think the issue was introduced when we dropped DAX support from raw
> > > > > > > mode.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Still DAX with raw mode never really worked any way. It was also
> > > > > > something that was broken from day one. So what happens to someone who
> > > > > > happened to avoid all the problems with page-less DAX and enabled
> > > > > > device-mapper on top? That failure mode detail needs to be added to
> > > > > > this changelog if we want to propose this for -stable.
> > > > > 
> > > > > My point is that the behavior should be consistent between pmem and
> > > > > device-mapper.  When -o dax succeeds on a pmem, then it should succeed
> > > > > on a device-mapper on top of that pmem.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Has the drop of dax support from raw mode made to -stable back to the
> > > > > baseline accepted 545ed20e6df6?  It will introduce inconsistency,
> > > > > otherwise.
> > > > 
> > > > That commit, 569d0365f571 "dax: require 'struct page' by default for
> > > > filesystem dax", has not been tagged for -stable.
> > > 
> > > Then, Fixes tag should be set to 569d0365f571 to keep the behavior
> > > consistent.
> > 
> > Sure, and the failure mode is...? I'm thinking the commit log should say:
> > 
> > "Starting with commit 569d0365f571 "dax: require 'struct page' by
> > default for filesystem dax", dax is no longer supported for page-less
> > configurations. However, device-mapper sees the QUEUE_FLAG_DAX still
> > being set and falsely assumes that DAX is enabled, this leads to
> > <insert user visible failure mode details here>"
> 
> Dan is correct that there is no user visible change for this.  It is the right
> thing to do for consistency and sanity, but it doesn't actually have user
> visible behavior that needs to be backported to stable.
> 
> Toshi is correct that this change is only for raw mode namespaces, not btt
> namespaces.
> 
> I'll adjust the changelog and remove the stable flag for v5, and I'll add a
> Fixes: tag for patch 2.

Hi Ross,

Your patches look good.  But I am still not clear about the Fixes &
stable handling.  Talking about user visible behavior, I do not think we
had any issue until dax support was dropped from raw mode.  Until then,
the pmem driver supported dax for all modes, and the check for
direct_access worked.    

Thanks,
-Toshi