From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
hughd@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, aspriel@gmail.com,
vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
joe@perches.com, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp,
aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, willy@infradead.org,
ying.huang@intel.com, shakeelb@google.com, jbacik@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] rcu: Make CONFIG_SRCU unconditionally enabled
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:20:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180808072040.GC27972@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <153365625652.19074.8434946780002619802.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue 07-08-18 18:37:36, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> This patch kills all CONFIG_SRCU defines and
> the code under !CONFIG_SRCU.
The last time somebody tried to do this there was a pushback due to
kernel tinyfication. So this should really give some numbers about the
code size increase. Also why can't we make this depend on MMU. Is
anybody else than the reclaim asking for unconditional SRCU usage?
Btw. I totaly agree with Steven. This is a very poor changelog. It is
trivial to see what the patch does but it is far from clear why it is
doing that and why we cannot go other ways.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-07 15:37 [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] rcu: Make CONFIG_SRCU unconditionally enabled Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 0:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-08 1:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08 9:46 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08 9:59 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 11:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08 7:20 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-08-08 10:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 10:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-08 21:31 ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-09 0:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-09 7:45 ` Greg KH
2018-08-09 10:22 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 16:13 ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-08 16:23 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 16:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 18:01 ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-08 23:02 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-08-08 23:09 ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-07 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] mm: Make shrink_slab() lockless Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 11:51 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 13:20 ` [PATCH RFC v2 " Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09 7:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-09 9:21 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09 10:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-09 10:58 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09 11:23 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] mm: Convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] mm: Split unregister_shrinker() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] fs: Move list_lru_destroy() to destroy_super_work() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] fs: Shrink only (SB_ACTIVE|SB_BORN) superblocks in super_cache_scan() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] fs: Introduce struct super_operations::destroy_super() callback Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Introduce xfs_fs_destroy_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] shmem: Implement shmem_destroy_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] fs: Use unregister_shrinker_delayed_{initiate, finalize} for super_block shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 1:12 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab() Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08 5:39 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-08-08 10:18 ` Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180808072040.GC27972@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=aspriel@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).