linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	darrick.wong@oracle.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	hughd@google.com, shuah@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, aspriel@gmail.com,
	vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	joe@perches.com, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp,
	aryabinin@virtuozzo.com, willy@infradead.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com, shakeelb@google.com, jbacik@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] mm: Make shrink_slab() lockless
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:23:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <964ee4fe-bbd1-0caa-4c5e-a73af99ee7bb@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180809071418.GA24884@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 09.08.2018 10:14, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 08-08-18 16:20:54, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> [Added two more places needed srcu_dereference(). All ->shrinker_map
>>  dereferences must be under SRCU, and this v2 adds missed in previous]
>>
>> The patch makes shrinker list and shrinker_idr SRCU-safe
>> for readers. This requires synchronize_srcu() on finalize
>> stage unregistering stage, which waits till all parallel
>> shrink_slab() are finished
>>
>> Note, that patch removes rwsem_is_contended() checks from
>> the code, and this does not result in delays during
>> registration, since there is no waiting at all. Unregistration
>> case may be optimized by splitting unregister_shrinker()
>> in tho stages, and this is made in next patches.
>>     
>> Also, keep in mind, that in case of SRCU is not allowed
>> to make unconditional (which is done in previous patch),
>> it is possible to use percpu_rw_semaphore instead of it.
>> percpu_down_read() will be used in shrink_slab_memcg()
>> and in shrink_slab(), and consecutive calls
>>
>>         percpu_down_write(percpu_rwsem);
>>         percpu_up_write(percpu_rwsem);
>>
>> will be used instead of synchronize_srcu().
> 
> An obvious question. Why didn't you go that way? What are pros/cons of
> both approaches?

percpu_rw_semaphore based variant looks something like:

commit d581d4ad7ecf
Author: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 9 14:21:12 2018 +0300

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0ff97e860759..fe8693775e33 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ unsigned long vm_total_pages;
 
 static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
+DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 
@@ -198,7 +199,10 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 		goto unlock;
 
 	if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
-		if (memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(id)) {
+		percpu_down_write(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
+		ret = memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(id);
+		percpu_up_write(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
+		if (ret) {
 			idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
@@ -406,7 +410,7 @@ void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
 	idr_replace(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, shrinker->id);
 #endif
@@ -434,8 +438,14 @@ void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
 		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	list_del(&shrinker->list);
+	list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list);
 	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+
+	synchronize_rcu();
+
+	percpu_down_write(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
+	percpu_up_write(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
+
 	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
 	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
 }
@@ -574,11 +584,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	if (!memcg_kmem_enabled() || !mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
+	if (!percpu_down_read_trylock(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem))
 		return 0;
 
 	map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
-					true);
+					true /* shrinker_percpu_rwsem */);
 	if (unlikely(!map))
 		goto unlock;
 
@@ -590,7 +600,22 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 		};
 		struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
+		/*
+		 * See shutdown sequence in unregister_shrinker().
+		 * RCU allows us to iterate IDR locklessly (this
+		 * is the way to synchronize with IDR changing by
+		 * idr_alloc()).
+		 *
+		 * If we see shrinker pointer undex RCU, this means
+		 * synchronize_rcu() in unregister_shrinker() has not
+		 * finished yet. Then, we unlock RCU, and synchronize_rcu()
+		 * can complete, but unregister_shrinker() can't proceed,
+		 * before we unlock shrinker_percpu_rwsem.
+		 */
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, i);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
 		if (unlikely(!shrinker || shrinker == SHRINKER_REGISTERING)) {
 			if (!shrinker)
 				clear_bit(i, map->map);
@@ -624,13 +649,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 		}
 		freed += ret;
 
-		if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
+		if (!rcu_sync_is_idle(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem.rss)) {
 			freed = freed ? : 1;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 unlock:
-	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	percpu_up_read(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
 	return freed;
 }
 #else /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
@@ -672,15 +697,17 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
 		return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority);
 
-	if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
+	if (!percpu_down_read_trylock(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem))
 		goto out;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
 		struct shrink_control sc = {
 			.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
 			.nid = nid,
 			.memcg = memcg,
 		};
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 
 		ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
 		if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
@@ -691,13 +718,16 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 		 * prevent the regsitration from being stalled for long periods
 		 * by parallel ongoing shrinking.
 		 */
-		if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
+		if (!rcu_sync_is_idle(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem.rss)) {
 			freed = freed ? : 1;
 			break;
 		}
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
-	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	percpu_up_read(&shrinker_percpu_rwsem);
 out:
 	cond_resched();
 	return freed;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-09 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-07 15:37 [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] rcu: Make CONFIG_SRCU unconditionally enabled Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08  0:55   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-08  1:05   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  9:46     ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08  1:08   ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  9:59     ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 11:04       ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  7:20   ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-08 10:17     ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 10:27       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-08 21:31         ` Dave Chinner
2018-08-09  0:07           ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-09  7:45             ` Greg KH
2018-08-09 10:22           ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 16:13       ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-08 16:23         ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 16:30           ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 18:01             ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-08 23:02               ` Shakeel Butt
2018-08-08 23:09                 ` Josh Triplett
2018-08-07 15:37 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] mm: Make shrink_slab() lockless Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 11:51   ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08 13:20     ` [PATCH RFC v2 " Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09  7:14       ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-09  9:21         ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09 10:37           ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-08-09 10:58             ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-09 11:23         ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] mm: Convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] mm: Split unregister_shrinker() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] fs: Move list_lru_destroy() to destroy_super_work() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] fs: Shrink only (SB_ACTIVE|SB_BORN) superblocks in super_cache_scan() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:38 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] fs: Introduce struct super_operations::destroy_super() callback Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] xfs: Introduce xfs_fs_destroy_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] shmem: Implement shmem_destroy_super() Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-07 15:39 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] fs: Use unregister_shrinker_delayed_{initiate, finalize} for super_block shrinker Kirill Tkhai
2018-08-08  1:12 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] Introduce lockless shrink_slab() Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-08  5:39   ` Shakeel Butt
2018-08-08 10:18     ` Kirill Tkhai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=964ee4fe-bbd1-0caa-4c5e-a73af99ee7bb@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=aspriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).