* Re: possible deadlock in flush_workqueue (2)
[not found] ` <0000000000009bcd4a0578e22ebd@google.com>
@ 2018-10-23 14:28 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-10-23 19:40 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Y. Ts'o @ 2018-10-23 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot
Cc: adilger.kernel, linux-ext4, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs,
linux-fsdevel, tj, jiangshanlai
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 02:42:03AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:
>
> HEAD commit: ca9eb48fe01f Merge tag 'regulator-v5.0' of git://git.kerne..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11a60939400000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=963b24abf3f7c2d8
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a50c7541a4a55cd49b02
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12097f03400000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10b55ac5400000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+a50c7541a4a55cd49b02@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
This is a false positive in lockdep, but it's not clear to me what's
the best way to fix it. It's not ext4-specific, so I've added
linux-fsdevel, Tejun, and Lai to the cc.
The problem is that when we first start doing direct I/O in a
particular file system, we use a lockless technique to allocate the
dio workqueue. From fs/direct-io.c:
int sb_init_dio_done_wq(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct workqueue_struct *old;
struct workqueue_struct *wq = alloc_workqueue("dio/%s",
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0,
sb->s_id);
if (!wq)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
* This has to be atomic as more DIOs can race to create the workqueue
*/
old = cmpxchg(&sb->s_dio_done_wq, NULL, wq);
/* Someone created workqueue before us? Free ours... */
if (old)
destroy_workqueue(wq);
return 0;
}
If we have multiple DIO writers racing to initialize
sb->s_dio_done_wq, the losers of the race will destroy the fresly
created workqueue. Because it's freshly created, there's nothing to
drain --- but lockdep doesn't know that.
One way I suppose we could solve this is to call sb_init_dio_done_wq
on open if the O_DIRECT flag is set. But now if we have multiple
threads racing to open files with O_DIRECT we'll still hit this
particular race.
The other, and I think better way, we could fix this is to have an
alternate destroy_never_used_workqueue() function which skips the
drain_workqueue().
What do people think?
The annotated lockdep is attached below.
- Ted
[ 263.210408] EXT4-fs (vdc): mounted filesystem without journal. Opts: acl,user_xattr,d
[ 263.227896]
[ 263.229118] ======================================================
[ 263.231370] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 263.232950] 4.19.0-rc6-xfstests-00021-g33458eaba4df #706 Not tainted
[ 263.234762] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 263.236915] kworker/1:3/1371 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 263.238630] 00000000f97c1367 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.}, at: __generic_file0
[ 263.241115]
[ 263.241115] but task is already holding lock:
[ 263.243121] 000000008f473d52 ((work_completion)(&dio->complete_work)){+.+.}, at: pro0
[ 263.246910]
[ 263.246910] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 263.246910]
[ 263.249597]
[ 263.249597] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 263.252024]
[ 263.252024] -> #2 ((work_completion)(&dio->complete_work)){+.+.}:
[ 263.254384] process_one_work (/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 /include/linux/jump_label.h:142 /include/trace/events/workqueue.h:89 /kernel/workqueue.c:2152)
[ 263.255835] worker_thread (/include/linux/compiler.h:188 /include/linux/list.h:203 /kernel/workqueue.c:2297)
[ 263.257180] kthread (/kernel/kthread.c:246)
[ 263.258310] ret_from_fork (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:419)
[ 263.259449]
[ 263.259449] -> #1 ((wq_completion)"dio/%s"sb->s_id){+.+.}:
[ 263.260991] flush_workqueue (/kernel/workqueue.c:2655)
[ 263.262024] drain_workqueue (/kernel/workqueue.c:2822)
[ 263.263076] destroy_workqueue (/kernel/workqueue.c:4158)
[ 263.264177] sb_init_dio_done_wq (/fs/direct-io.c:636)
[ 263.265131] __blockdev_direct_IO (/fs/direct-io.c:1283 /fs/direct-io.c:1417)
[ 263.266248] ext4_direct_IO (/fs/ext4/inode.c:3778 /fs/ext4/inode.c:3901)
[ 263.267184] generic_file_direct_write (/mm/filemap.c:3057)
[ 263.268164] __generic_file_write_iter (/mm/filemap.c:3229)
[ 263.269173] ext4_file_write_iter (/include/linux/fs.h:743 /fs/ext4/file.c:267)
[ 263.270052] aio_write (/fs/aio.c:1473 /fs/aio.c:1561)
[ 263.270821] io_submit_one (/fs/aio.c:1836)
[ 263.272136] __se_sys_io_submit (/fs/aio.c:1916 /fs/aio.c:1887)
[ 263.273565] do_syscall_64 (/arch/x86/entry/common.c:290)
[ 263.274831] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:240)
[ 263.276514]
[ 263.276514] -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.}:
[ 263.278492] lock_acquire (/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:788 /kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3903)
[ 263.279690] down_write (/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:160 /kernel/locking/rwsem.c:72)
[ 263.280812] __generic_file_fsync (/fs/libfs.c:982)
[ 263.282156] ext4_sync_file (/fs/ext4/fsync.c:121)
[ 263.283400] dio_complete (/include/linux/fs.h:2733 /fs/direct-io.c:329)
[ 263.284629] process_one_work (/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 /include/linux/jump_label.h:142 /include/trace/events/workqueue.h:114 /kernel/workqueue.c:2158)
[ 263.285916] worker_thread (/include/linux/compiler.h:188 /include/linux/list.h:203 /kernel/workqueue.c:2297)
[ 263.287114] kthread (/kernel/kthread.c:246)
[ 263.288198] ret_from_fork (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:419)
[ 263.289394]
[ 263.289394] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 263.289394]
[ 263.291805] Chain exists of:
[ 263.291805] &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11 --> (wq_completion)"dio/%s"sb->s_id --> (w)
[ 263.291805]
[ 263.294392] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 263.294392]
[ 263.295398] CPU0 CPU1
[ 263.296171] ---- ----
[ 263.296949] lock((work_completion)(&dio->complete_work));
[ 263.298481] lock((wq_completion)"dio/%s"sb->s_id);
[ 263.300579] lock((work_completion)(&dio->complete_wor;
[ 263.302856] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11);
[ 263.304175]
[ 263.304175] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 263.304175]
[ 263.305861] 2 locks held by kworker/1:3/1371:
[ 263.307097] #0: 000000004a793a56 ((wq_completion)"dio/%s"sb->s_id){+.+.}, at: proce0
[ 263.309761] #1: 000000008f473d52 ((work_completion)(&dio->complete_work)){+.+.}, at0
[ 263.312663]
[ 263.312663] stack backtrace:
[ 263.313881] CPU: 1 PID: 1371 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6-xfstests-000216
[ 263.316541] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-1 04/4
[ 263.318894] Workqueue: dio/vdc dio_aio_complete_work
[ 263.320303] Call Trace:
[ 263.321038] dump_stack (/lib/dump_stack.c:115)
[ 263.322010] print_circular_bug.isra.19.cold.39 (/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1221)
[ 263.323581] check_prev_add.constprop.27 (/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1861)
[ 263.324991] __lock_acquire (/kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1975 /kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2415 /kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3411)
[ 263.326054] lock_acquire (/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:788 /kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3903)
[ 263.327086] ? __generic_file_fsync (/fs/libfs.c:982)
[ 263.328349] down_write (/arch/x86/include/asm/rwsem.h:160 /kernel/locking/rwsem.c:72)
[ 263.329300] ? __generic_file_fsync (/fs/libfs.c:982)
[ 263.330504] __generic_file_fsync (/fs/libfs.c:982)
[ 263.331663] ext4_sync_file (/fs/ext4/fsync.c:121)
[ 263.332722] dio_complete (/include/linux/fs.h:2733 /fs/direct-io.c:329)
[ 263.333772] process_one_work (/arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 /include/linux/jump_label.h:142 /include/trace/events/workqueue.h:114 /kernel/workqueue.c:2158)
[ 263.334719] worker_thread (/include/linux/compiler.h:188 /include/linux/list.h:203 /kernel/workqueue.c:2297)
[ 263.335482] ? process_one_work (/kernel/workqueue.c:2239)
[ 263.336241] kthread (/kernel/kthread.c:246)
[ 263.336826] ? kthread_park (/kernel/kthread.c:206)
[ 263.337548] ret_from_fork (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:419)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread