[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 103/107] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 103/107] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns

[Sasha Levin]

From: Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 8da0b4f692c6d90b09c91f271517db746a22ff67 ]

Access to timerslack_ns is controlled by a process having CAP_SYS_NICE
in its effective capability set, but the current check looks in the root
namespace instead of the process' user namespace.  Since a process is
allowed to do other activities controlled by CAP_SYS_NICE inside a
namespace, it should also be able to adjust timerslack_ns.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181030180012.232896-1-bmgordon@google.com
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@google.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com>
Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Cc: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 79702d405ba7..f73de326c630 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2337,10 +2337,13 @@ static ssize_t timerslack_ns_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		return -ESRCH;
 
 	if (p != current) {
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			count = -EPERM;
 			goto out;
 		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 
 		err = security_task_setscheduler(p);
 		if (err) {
@@ -2373,11 +2376,14 @@ static int timerslack_ns_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		return -ESRCH;
 
 	if (p != current) {
-
-		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (!ns_capable(__task_cred(p)->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 			err = -EPERM;
 			goto out;
 		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
 		err = security_task_getscheduler(p);
 		if (err)
 			goto out;
-- 
2.19.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 105/107] proc/sysctl: fix return error for proc_doulongvec_minmax()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>

[ Upstream commit 09be178400829dddc1189b50a7888495dd26aa84 ]

If the number of input parameters is less than the total parameters, an
EINVAL error will be returned.

For example, we use proc_doulongvec_minmax to pass up to two parameters
with kern_table:

{
	.procname       = "monitor_signals",
	.data           = &monitor_sigs,
	.maxlen         = 2*sizeof(unsigned long),
	.mode           = 0644,
	.proc_handler   = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
},

Reproduce:

When passing two parameters, it's work normal.  But passing only one
parameter, an error "Invalid argument"(EINVAL) is returned.

  [root@cl150 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  1       2
  [root@cl150 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
  [root@cl150 ~]# echo $?
  1
  [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  3       2
  [root@cl150 ~]#

The following is the result after apply this patch.  No error is
returned when the number of input parameters is less than the total
parameters.

  [root@cl150 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  1       2
  [root@cl150 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  [root@cl150 ~]# echo $?
  0
  [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
  3       2
  [root@cl150 ~]#

There are three processing functions dealing with digital parameters,
__do_proc_dointvec/__do_proc_douintvec/__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax.

This patch deals with __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax, just as
__do_proc_dointvec does, adding a check for parameters 'left'.  In
__do_proc_douintvec, its code implementation explicitly does not support
multiple inputs.

static int __do_proc_douintvec(...){
         ...
         /*
          * Arrays are not supported, keep this simple. *Do not* add
          * support for them.
          */
         if (vleft != 1) {
                 *lenp = 0;
                 return -EINVAL;
         }
         ...
}

So, just __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax has the problem.  And most use of
proc_doulongvec_minmax/proc_doulongvec_ms_jiffies_minmax just have one
parameter.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544081775-15720-1-git-send-email-cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sysctl.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 23f658d311c0..93c7b02279b9 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2503,6 +2503,8 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
 			bool neg;
 
 			left -= proc_skip_spaces(&p);
+			if (!left)
+				break;
 
 			err = proc_get_long(&p, &left, &val, &neg,
 					     proc_wspace_sep,
-- 
2.19.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 106/107] fs/epoll: drop ovflist branch prediction

[Sasha Levin]

From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>

[ Upstream commit 76699a67f3041ff4c7af6d6ee9be2bfbf1ffb671 ]

The ep->ovflist is a secondary ready-list to temporarily store events
that might occur when doing sproc without holding the ep->wq.lock.  This
accounts for every time we check for ready events and also send events
back to userspace; both callbacks, particularly the latter because of
copy_to_user, can account for a non-trivial time.

As such, the unlikely() check to see if the pointer is being used, seems
both misleading and sub-optimal.  In fact, we go to an awful lot of
trouble to sync both lists, and populating the ovflist is far from an
uncommon scenario.

For example, profiling a concurrent epoll_wait(2) benchmark, with
CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES shows that for a two threads a 33%
incorrect rate was seen; and when incrementally increasing the number of
epoll instances (which is used, for example for multiple queuing load
balancing models), up to a 90% incorrect rate was seen.

Similarly, by deleting the prediction, 3% throughput boost was seen
across incremental threads.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181108051006.18751-4-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 3cbc30413add..a9c0bf8782f5 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
 	 * semantics). All the events that happen during that period of time are
 	 * chained in ep->ovflist and requeued later on.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(ep->ovflist != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR)) {
+	if (ep->ovflist != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR) {
 		if (epi->next == EP_UNACTIVE_PTR) {
 			epi->next = ep->ovflist;
 			ep->ovflist = epi;
-- 
2.19.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 107/107] exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string

[Sasha Levin]

From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 8099b047ecc431518b9bb6bdbba3549bbecdc343 ]

load_script() simply truncates bprm->buf and this is very wrong if the
length of shebang string exceeds BINPRM_BUF_SIZE-2.  This can silently
truncate i_arg or (worse) we can execute the wrong binary if buf[2:126]
happens to be the valid executable path.

Change load_script() to return ENOEXEC if it can't find '\n' or zero in
bprm->buf.  Note that '\0' can come from either
prepare_binprm()->memset() or from kernel_read(), we do not care.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181112160931.GA28463@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Ben Woodard <woodard@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/binfmt_script.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_script.c b/fs/binfmt_script.c
index afdf4e3cafc2..634bdbb23851 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_script.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_script.c
@@ -43,10 +43,14 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	fput(bprm->file);
 	bprm->file = NULL;
 
-	bprm->buf[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
-	if ((cp = strchr(bprm->buf, '\n')) == NULL)
-		cp = bprm->buf+BINPRM_BUF_SIZE-1;
+	for (cp = bprm->buf+2;; cp++) {
+		if (cp >= bprm->buf + BINPRM_BUF_SIZE)
+			return -ENOEXEC;
+		if (!*cp || (*cp == '\n'))
+			break;
+	}
 	*cp = '\0';
+
 	while (cp > bprm->buf) {
 		cp--;
 		if ((*cp == ' ') || (*cp == '\t'))
-- 
2.19.1