linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Ross Lagerwall" <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	"Mark Syms" <Mark.Syms@citrix.com>,
	"Edwin Török" <edvin.torok@citrix.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:51:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328165104.GA21552@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321131304.21618-1-agruenba@redhat.com>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 02:13:04PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> we need your help fixing a gfs2 deadlock involving iomap.  What's going
> on is the following:
> 
> * During iomap_file_buffered_write, gfs2_iomap_begin grabs the log flush
>   lock and keeps it until gfs2_iomap_end.  It currently always does that
>   even though there is no point other than for journaled data writes.
> 
> * iomap_file_buffered_write then calls balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited.
>   If that ends up calling gfs2_write_inode, gfs2 will try to grab the
>   log flush lock again and deadlock.

What is the exactly call chain?  balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited these
days doesn't start I/O, but just wakes up the flusher threads.  Or
do we have a issue where it is blocking on those threads?

Also why do you need to flush the log for background writeback in
->write_inode?

balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited is per definition not a data integrity
writeback, so there shouldn't be a good reason to flush the log
(which I assume the log flush log is for).  If we look gfs2_write_inode,
this seems to be the code:

	bool flush_all = (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || gfs2_is_jdata(ip));

        if (flush_all)
		gfs2_log_flush(GFS2_SB(inode), ip->i_gl,
			       GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
			       GFS2_LFC_WRITE_INODE);

But what is the requirement to do this in writeback context?  Can't
we move it out into another context instead?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-28 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 13:13 gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-21 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-21 23:01   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-22  0:21   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-27 16:49     ` Ross Lagerwall
2019-03-28 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-03-29 22:13   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-07  7:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08  8:53       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-08 13:44         ` Jan Kara
2019-04-09 12:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-09 12:27             ` Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190328165104.GA21552@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Mark.Syms@citrix.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=edvin.torok@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).