From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Ross Lagerwall" <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
"Mark Syms" <Mark.Syms@citrix.com>,
"Edwin Török" <edvin.torok@citrix.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:51:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328165104.GA21552@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190321131304.21618-1-agruenba@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 02:13:04PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> we need your help fixing a gfs2 deadlock involving iomap. What's going
> on is the following:
>
> * During iomap_file_buffered_write, gfs2_iomap_begin grabs the log flush
> lock and keeps it until gfs2_iomap_end. It currently always does that
> even though there is no point other than for journaled data writes.
>
> * iomap_file_buffered_write then calls balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited.
> If that ends up calling gfs2_write_inode, gfs2 will try to grab the
> log flush lock again and deadlock.
What is the exactly call chain? balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited these
days doesn't start I/O, but just wakes up the flusher threads. Or
do we have a issue where it is blocking on those threads?
Also why do you need to flush the log for background writeback in
->write_inode?
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited is per definition not a data integrity
writeback, so there shouldn't be a good reason to flush the log
(which I assume the log flush log is for). If we look gfs2_write_inode,
this seems to be the code:
bool flush_all = (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || gfs2_is_jdata(ip));
if (flush_all)
gfs2_log_flush(GFS2_SB(inode), ip->i_gl,
GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
GFS2_LFC_WRITE_INODE);
But what is the requirement to do this in writeback context? Can't
we move it out into another context instead?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-21 13:13 gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-21 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-21 23:01 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-22 0:21 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-27 16:49 ` Ross Lagerwall
2019-03-28 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-03-29 22:13 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-07 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08 8:53 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-08 13:44 ` Jan Kara
2019-04-09 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-09 12:27 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328165104.GA21552@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Mark.Syms@citrix.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=edvin.torok@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).