linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	cluster-devel <cluster-devel@redhat.com>,
	"Mark Syms" <Mark.Syms@citrix.com>,
	"Edwin Török" <edvin.torok@citrix.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:49:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e564e4b-2366-8728-c1cb-3467aad2d0f0@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322002100.5628-1-agruenba@redhat.com>

On 3/22/19 12:21 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 00:01, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 22:43, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>>> The problem is calling balance_dirty_pages() inside the
>>> ->iomap_begin/->iomap_end calls and not that it is called by the
>>> iomap infrastructure itself, right?
>>>
>>> Is so, I'd prefer to see this in iomap_apply() after the call to
>>> ops->iomap_end because iomap_file_buffered_write() can iterate and
>>> call iomap_apply() multiple times. This would keep the balancing to
>>> a per-iomap granularity, rather than a per-syscall granularity.
>>>
>>> i.e. if we do write(2GB), we want more than one balancing call
>>> during that syscall, so it would be up to the filesystem to a) limit
>>> the size of write mappings to something smaller (e.g. 1024 pages)
>>> so that there are still frequent balancing calls for large writes.
>>
>> Hmm. The looping across multiple mappings isn't done in iomap_apply
>> but in iomap_file_buffered_write, so the balancing could go into
>> iomap_apply or iomap_file_buffered_write, but can't go further up the
>> stack. Given that, iomap_file_buffered_write seems the better place,
>> but this is still quite horrible.
> 
> Here's a more reasonable version of my first patch, with a cleaned up
> and hopefully fixed gfs2 part.
> 
> In addition, this checks for IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED in iomap_dirty_actor,
> the actor for iomap_file_dirty.  We don't use iomap_file_dirty in gfs2,
> but we should probably allowing to skip the dirty page balancing there
> as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andreas
> ---
>   fs/gfs2/bmap.c        | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   fs/iomap.c            |  6 ++--
>   include/linux/iomap.h |  1 +
>   3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
Thanks, this fixes the reported deadlock. I haven't yet checked whether 
it has any performance impact.

Tested-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 13:13 gfs2 iomap dealock, IOMAP_F_UNBALANCED Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-21 21:43 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-21 23:01   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-22  0:21   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-03-27 16:49     ` Ross Lagerwall [this message]
2019-03-28 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-29 22:13   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-07  7:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08  8:53       ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-04-08 13:44         ` Jan Kara
2019-04-09 12:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-09 12:27             ` Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e564e4b-2366-8728-c1cb-3467aad2d0f0@citrix.com \
    --to=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=Mark.Syms@citrix.com \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=edvin.torok@citrix.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).