linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stefan Bühler" <source@stbuehler.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 5/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before reading SQ tail
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:54:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424215422.7404-5-source@stbuehler.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190424215422.7404-1-source@stbuehler.de>

There is no operation before to order with.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Bühler <source@stbuehler.de>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 31357cc0e8e6..f93a9fca8311 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1828,8 +1828,6 @@ static bool io_get_sqring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct sqe_submit *s)
 	 *    though the application is the one updating it.
 	 */
 	head = ctx->cached_sq_head;
-	/* See comment at the top of this file */
-	smp_rmb();
 	/* make sure SQ entry isn't read before tail */
 	if (head == smp_load_acquire(&ring->r.tail))
 		return false;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-24 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-14 16:44 io_uring memory ordering (and broken queue-is-full checks) Stefan Bühler
2019-04-17 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-19  9:29   ` Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19  9:57     ` [PATCH v1 1/3] io_uring: fix race condition reading SQ entries Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19  9:57       ` [PATCH v1 2/3] io_uring: fix race condition when sq threads goes sleeping Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19  9:57       ` [PATCH v1 3/3] io_uring: fix poll full SQ detection Stefan Bühler
2019-04-22 17:04     ` io_uring memory ordering (and broken queue-is-full checks) Jens Axboe
2019-04-24 21:54     ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 1/7] io_uring: fix notes on barriers Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54       ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 2/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before wq_has_sleeper Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54       ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 3/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before reading cq head Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54       ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 4/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after updating SQ head Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54       ` Stefan Bühler [this message]
2019-04-24 21:54       ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 6/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after incrementing dropped counter Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54       ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 7/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after unsetting IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP Stefan Bühler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190424215422.7404-5-source@stbuehler.de \
    --to=source@stbuehler.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).