From: "Stefan Bühler" <source@stbuehler.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 7/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after unsetting IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:54:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190424215422.7404-7-source@stbuehler.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190424215422.7404-1-source@stbuehler.de>
There is no operation to order with afterwards, and removing the flag is
not critical in any way.
There will always be a "race condition" where the application will
trigger IORING_ENTER_SQ_WAKEUP when it isn't actually needed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bühler <source@stbuehler.de>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 0287f6694e3b..da084bcbd408 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1966,13 +1966,11 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
finish_wait(&ctx->sqo_wait, &wait);
ctx->sq_ring->flags &= ~IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP;
- smp_wmb();
continue;
}
finish_wait(&ctx->sqo_wait, &wait);
ctx->sq_ring->flags &= ~IORING_SQ_NEED_WAKEUP;
- smp_wmb();
}
i = 0;
--
2.20.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-24 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-14 16:44 io_uring memory ordering (and broken queue-is-full checks) Stefan Bühler
2019-04-17 15:02 ` Jens Axboe
2019-04-19 9:29 ` Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] io_uring: fix race condition reading SQ entries Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] io_uring: fix race condition when sq threads goes sleeping Stefan Bühler
2019-04-19 9:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] io_uring: fix poll full SQ detection Stefan Bühler
2019-04-22 17:04 ` io_uring memory ordering (and broken queue-is-full checks) Jens Axboe
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 1/7] io_uring: fix notes on barriers Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 2/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before wq_has_sleeper Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 3/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before reading cq head Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 4/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after updating SQ head Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 5/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier before reading SQ tail Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` [PATCH barrier cleanup v1 6/7] io_uring: remove unnecessary barrier after incrementing dropped counter Stefan Bühler
2019-04-24 21:54 ` Stefan Bühler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190424215422.7404-7-source@stbuehler.de \
--to=source@stbuehler.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).